It always makes me laugh this whole 'elite knows best' argument, as though our whole society isn't set up around people that know what they're doing, doing those jobs. You'd think if our house was on fire we'd be happy with Janet down the street pointing her hose at it rather than calling the fire brigade, or Steve getting his hacksaw out to do your ma's hip operation.
It's been proven so many times that the average voter knows the square root of bugger all about how government works. That's bad enough, but it's actually worse than that, because whereas Janet doesn't believe she's a fireman, or Steve a surgeon, they both probably think they know how to run the bloody NHS or how trade treaties should be negotiated. They're wildly wrong about so much, yet believe themselves to be incredibly well-informed, yet democracy dictates that we give such people just as much say as those that do have a clue.
It's less Trueman Show, more Stars in their Eyes, with people waking up in the morning deciding they're going to be an economist or a lawyer or whatever, and we give them the bloody credibility to believe they can be. Maybe at least this holy mess we're in will at last put to bed the trite rollocks that democracy is great because at least it doesn't result in dictatorial tossers being voted in.
What a terrible post from you, Bruce.
Let me give you an analogy. I've mentioned this once before on here, but it warrants repetition in the light of the above.
In the 1970s Bill Shankly had a weekly radio programme interviewing sporting personalities. Most times, it turned into him talking at length about varius subjects, but was fascinating nonetheless. On one occasion he had George Best on his programme, when Best was in one of those troughs in his career. At one point, Shankly said, in so many words: 'On the pitch you can't hide. You can't bluff the supporters. You may be at the peak of your career, and have reached the heights, but you can't fool the supporters. You know why? A lot of those supporters have been watching football for years/decades ever before you were born. They know more about the game than you will ever know. You can't con or fool them. They know the game inside out. You can't hide. They see everything you do on the pitch.' And he was right, and that is applicable today as it was then, and every week in-between.
So your Janet and Steve analogy is rubbish, Bruce. One doesn't have to be a TV engineer to know how to switch the TV on and operate it. One doesn't have to be sooper-dooper IT qualified person to switch on a PC and know your way around the internet. Yours is therefore a fallacious and flawed point. I would not even call it reasoning, because it is not. So for you to produce such denigration in your second paragraph is plain wrong. One doesn't have to be Messi or Ronaldo to know about football, comprehensively...
If one were to follow your point slavishly, one would indeed believe pre-23rd June last year that the financial scenario would turn to merde and the whole economic basis of the country was going down the pan if the vote was to leave, according to the 'so-called experts'. In fact those 'experts' have made an utter balls of several things in recent years to such an extent that one can legitimately wonder whether they actually 'know the square root of bugger all' (as you succinctly put it!) about their chosen specialist profession. Finger-in-the-wind merchants, that's all they are.