Current Affairs Environmental Stuff

Status
Not open for further replies.

Winnie The Pooh not bothering, which says it all about just how pointless this all is.
I wouldn't say that there is no point, there definitely is a vital point.

However, as illustrated earlier in the thread, COP has been totally ineffective, merely giving an impression something's being done, which has been downright dangerous to the future humanity.
 
I know the media do these stories to wind people up but I've just seen that another of these Insulate Britain protestors drove around 52 countries the other year.

All a bit odd.
 
Kicking off at the National Trust - a group of right wing entryists are standing for election to its council. They've had it up to here with these bloody woke snowflakes banging on about slavery.



The trust has clout - 5 million plus members, one of the largest land owners in the country. I believe this argy bargy clouds the real issues at play (usually the case whenever the woke / antiwoke circus comes to town) - the NT has massive upkeep costs for decaying stately homes, a lot are remote and not all that interesting.
So there are tensions between the bums on seats, dumb it down, bigger tea room approach, and a more historical curation approach which is costly and will never bring a return at a lot of places. But the NT is legally bound to the upkeep of these buildings - it is the custodian of really substantial amounts of heritage and it's an important question as to what we want to do with it.
 
Kicking off at the National Trust - a group of right wing entryists are standing for election to its council. They've had it up to here with these bloody woke snowflakes banging on about slavery.



The trust has clout - 5 million plus members, one of the largest land owners in the country. I believe this argy bargy clouds the real issues at play (usually the case whenever the woke / antiwoke circus comes to town) - the NT has massive upkeep costs for decaying stately homes, a lot are remote and not all that interesting.
So there are tensions between the bums on seats, dumb it down, bigger tea room approach, and a more historical curation approach which is costly and will never bring a return at a lot of places. But the NT is legally bound to the upkeep of these buildings - it is the custodian of really substantial amounts of heritage and it's an important question as to what we want to do with it.
Yeah, CBA with the bunch of fannies, I'll ditch our longstanding subscription for deffo.
 
Kicking off at the National Trust - a group of right wing entryists are standing for election to its council. They've had it up to here with these bloody woke snowflakes banging on about slavery.



The trust has clout - 5 million plus members, one of the largest land owners in the country. I believe this argy bargy clouds the real issues at play (usually the case whenever the woke / antiwoke circus comes to town) - the NT has massive upkeep costs for decaying stately homes, a lot are remote and not all that interesting.
So there are tensions between the bums on seats, dumb it down, bigger tea room approach, and a more historical curation approach which is costly and will never bring a return at a lot of places. But the NT is legally bound to the upkeep of these buildings - it is the custodian of really substantial amounts of heritage and it's an important question as to what we want to do with it.

Simon Jenkins is such a tit - article after article blaming everyone other than journalists.

As an aside though our culture and history does need to be better managed. Chester for example should be much better tourist destination than it is.
 
What do they propose to improve air quality?
It's quite high-level stuff tbh, but it's a meaningful change as they're joined by the World Health Organisation in highlighting the health impact of climate change, which Pete et al were disputing earlier in this thread.


We call on the leaders of every country and their representatives at COP26 to avert the impending health catastrophe by limiting global warming to 1.5°C, and to make human health and equity central to all climate change mitigation and adaptation actions.

Specifically:

  • We call on all nations to update their national climate commitments under the Paris Agreement to commit to their fair share of limiting warming to 1.5°C; and we call on them to build health into those plans;
  • We call on all nations to deliver a rapid and just transition away from fossil fuels, starting with immediately cutting all related permits, subsidies and financing for fossil fuels, and to completely shift current financing into development of clean energy;
  • We call on high income countries to make larger cuts to greenhouse gas emissions, in line with a 1.5°C temperature goal;
  • We call on high income countries to also provide the promised transfer of funds to low-income countries to help achieve the necessary mitigation and adaptation measures;
  • We call on governments to build climate resilient, low-carbon, sustainable health systems; and
  • We call on governments to also ensure that pandemic recovery investments support climate action and reduce social and health inequities.
 
I would suggest being careful of what you wish for. Australia had a national insulation rollout program a few years ago. Due to the industry growing exponentially almost overnight, the govt lost oversight and a lot of cowboys entered the market, directly resulting in 4 deaths and over 100 house fires.

A royal enquiry placed the blame squarely at the feet of the govt.

I dread to think of the outcome if Johnson is in charge of it
 
Nice sentiments, but they'll get fobbed off again with carbon credit scamming, or somesuch.

Do you actually think it's possible to replace our current economic model based on cheap oil with a green equivalent that's environmentally sound ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top