Cardiff are appealing to the Court of Arbitration for Sport against Fifa’s ruling that they must pay Nantes the transfer fee for the striker killed in a plane crash
www.theguardian.com
From this, if the agent was mandated to sell him on Nantes behalf, then are they ultimately responsible for the transport arrangements? Are Cardiff correct in saying that they had not signed him and the conditions of the sale were not met?
If I bought a 5 or 50 thousand pound plate at auction and it was smashed before delivery, I wouldn't pay for it and demand my money back. (I'd also assume there was an insurance facility available). If I had agreed to a cash on delivery type deal, I'd just close the door and tell them to whistle for it if it was smashed, especially if the seller had paid the auctioneer to be responsible for the delivery. I think that this one is going to run and run and run. I suspect that Nantes, Cardiff and Sala's agent hadn't completely sorted this deal out and/ or put the right insurance policies in place to cover the transitional period for the player's move to Cardiff from Nantes, let alone sort out the correct transport.
I assume that this is part of why transfer deals take so long in a lot of cases. To make sure this sort of thing is avoided. I would not be surprised if a lot of transfers are done on the fly and some risks are assumed as part and parcel of them, with Sala's death being a huge outlier that wasn't even considered.
One for the law to decide. I think that this one isn't over by a long shot.