ECHO Comment: "Fears of Witch-hunt Against Liverpool FC"

[Pat's Van]

Nope this place doesn't come close to even being a shadow of the madness of that place.
We should use stats to work out the percentage of graphs used per thread here and on RAWK to compare.. and I suspect... uh oh its the paddle of rebuck popping up again... sorry.

nonsense!! we're a pie chart forum, always have been

 

[AndyC]

nonsense!! we're a pie chart forum, always have been

Unlike Wigan, who have a pie-eating pie chart forum

 

[IllinoisBlue]

I think i'm starting to like Mario, he obviously likes to take piss out of himself and his team-mates:

http://www.independent.ie/sport/soc...ven-gerrard-is-as-good-as-pirlo-30669659.html

He has a very poor opinion of Pirlo then.

 

[Ihaters]

nonsense!! we're a pie chart forum, always have been

Yeah but in their alternative pie chart table they would be well above us.

 

[Ihaters]

He has a very poor opinion of Pirlo then.

Its the only explanation, also he may be a little mistaken by how much the fans appreciate his... 'hard work'.

 

[davek]

RAWK:

Lastly, there has been some suggestion last year’s title challenge was some sort of fluke. While no one expected it, the rise into the top 4 certainly wasn’t a fluke. Liverpool’s expected goal ratio, which I found to have strong correlation (R2=0.78) with points earned, has risen since the 10/11 season where they posted a XGR of just 53.8, they’ve had an XGR of 0.636, 0.637 and last seasons 0.655 since that poor 10/11 season. In fact, they are the only team to have an XGR >0.60 to finish outside the top 4 (twice) in the last 4 seasons. It’s almost like there was a plan in place.

 

[sd_1992]

RAWK:

Lastly, there has been some suggestion last year’s title challenge was some sort of fluke. While no one expected it, the rise into the top 4 certainly wasn’t a fluke. Liverpool’s expected goal ratio, which I found to have strong correlation (R2=0.78) with points earned, has risen since the 10/11 season where they posted a XGR of just 53.8, they’ve had an XGR of 0.636, 0.637 and last seasons 0.655 since that poor 10/11 season. In fact, they are the only team to have an XGR >0.60 to finish outside the top 4 (twice) in the last 4 seasons. It’s almost like there was a plan in place.

Some of them over there are in serious need of some mental healthcare and counselling.

I feel I should point out that an R^2 value of 0.78 is actually incredibly weak....

 

[roydo]

Can you imagine the scenes on here if someone posted something like it?

 

[Prevenger17]

I can't even put myself through that, I don't generally venture onto RAWK to often, but it's quite a strange place. Although the Everton Forum on here runs it close sometimes.

Not as close as you think, Bungle. I've crunched some numbers and some startling conclusions can be derived from a few key factors:

The Whiny Hypocritical Observation Per Page Representation or, as we'll call it, the WHOPPR ratio.

The Beauts Entering Lots and Lots of Extremely Nonsensical Data factor or, as the boys call it down at the lab call it; the BELLEND formula.


Now, RAWK has 39 posts per page, meaning that we need to divide that by the average number of WHOPPRS, which a cursory survey revealed to be in the 38 region. Multiplying that by 100 will show us RAWK's WHOPPR percentage.

38/39= .97435 x 100= 97.4%

Now, our number of WHOPPRS often fluctuates, but it tends to hover around the 3 per page mark, giving us a WHOPPR.Pc of 20%, which is comparatively tiny. An even bigger difference comes when the treatment of WHOPPRS is factored in. On GoT, WHOPPRs are often eliminated with extreme prejudice by good and balanced modding, with the resulting flowchart depicting a WHOPPR decline of about 4% per quarter. Conversely, RAWK not only hold on to their WHOPPRs, but reward them with stars and modding jobs and the ability to write open letters on their homepage that a 5 year old would be embarrassed about. Coupled with their firm commitment to banning posters who spout anything resembling a reasonable opinion, their WHOPPR.Pc is creeping up and should reach critical mass in about 6 months time.

Now, we don't need data entry to see that our BELLENDs are a scattered few, hawking their numbers about on diverse threads but receiving nothing but scorn for their efforts. A quick look at RAWK reveals two whole threads full to the brim with BELLENDS , and they're only the ones we know about from the links posted on a few pages here. I have a 600 page dossier should you wish to know more.

 

[Bungle]

Not as close as you think, Bungle. I've crunched some numbers and some startling conclusions can be derived from a few key factors:

The Whiny Hypocritical Observation Per Page Representation or, as we'll call it, the WHOPPR ratio.

The Beauts Entering Lots and Lots of Extremely Nonsensical Data factor or, as the boys call it down at the lab call it; the BELLEND formula.


Now, RAWK has 39 posts per page, meaning that we need to divide that by the average number of WHOPPRS, which a cursory survey revealed to be in the 38 region. Multiplying that by 100 will show us RAWK's WHOPPR percentage.

38/39= .97435 x 100= 97.4%

Now, our number of WHOPPRS often fluctuates, but it tends to hover around the 3 per page mark, giving us a WHOPPR.Pc of 20%, which is comparatively tiny. An even bigger difference comes when the treatment of WHOPPRS is factored in. On GoT, WHOPPRs are often eliminated with extreme prejudice by good and balanced modding, with the resulting flowchart depicting a WHOPPR decline of about 4% per quarter. Conversely, RAWK not only hold on to their WHOPPRs, but reward them with stars and modding jobs and the ability to write open letters on their homepage that a 5 year old would be embarrassed about. Coupled with their firm commitment to banning posters who spout anything resembling a reasonable opinion, their WHOPPR.Pc is creeping up and should reach critical mass in about 6 months time.

Now, we don't need data entry to see that our BELLENDs are a scattered few, hawking their numbers about on diverse threads but receiving nothing but scorn for their efforts. A quick look at RAWK reveals two whole threads full to the brim with BELLENDS , and they're only the ones we know about from the links posted on a few pages here. I have a 600 page dossier should you wish too know more.

Yes please mate, if you could post that as a pdf attachment I'd be grateful.

 

[davek]

Can you imagine the scenes on here if someone posted something like it?

Chalk and cheese aren't we? There's a hefty number of Kopites with no inhibition whatsoever. They're completely absent of that inner rational voice that goes: "nah, I wont post that, I'd embarrass meself."

 

[Bungle]

Chalk and cheese aren't we? There's a hefty number of Kopites with no inhibition whatsoever. They're completely absent of that inner rational voice that goes: "nah, I wont post that, I'd embarrass meself."

I think I might be a Kopite

 

[Dithering Dougie]

Chalk and cheese aren't we? There's a hefty number of Kopites with no inhibition whatsoever. They're completely absent of that inner rational voice that goes: "nah, I wont post that, I'd embarrass meself."

Have you never looked on the Lukaku thread?

 

[Ihaters]

Not as close as you think, Bungle. I've crunched some numbers and some startling conclusions can be derived from a few key factors:

The Whiny Hypocritical Observation Per Page Representation or, as we'll call it, the WHOPPR ratio.

The Beauts Entering Lots and Lots of Extremely Nonsensical Data factor or, as the boys call it down at the lab call it; the BELLEND formula.


Now, RAWK has 39 posts per page, meaning that we need to divide that by the average number of WHOPPRS, which a cursory survey revealed to be in the 38 region. Multiplying that by 100 will show us RAWK's WHOPPR percentage.

38/39= .97435 x 100= 97.4%

Now, our number of WHOPPRS often fluctuates, but it tends to hover around the 3 per page mark, giving us a WHOPPR.Pc of 20%, which is comparatively tiny. An even bigger difference comes when the treatment of WHOPPRS is factored in. On GoT, WHOPPRs are often eliminated with extreme prejudice by good and balanced modding, with the resulting flowchart depicting a WHOPPR decline of about 4% per quarter. Conversely, RAWK not only hold on to their WHOPPRs, but reward them with stars and modding jobs and the ability to write open letters on their homepage that a 5 year old would be embarrassed about. Coupled with their firm commitment to banning posters who spout anything resembling a reasonable opinion, their WHOPPR.Pc is creeping up and should reach critical mass in about 6 months time.

Now, we don't need data entry to see that our BELLENDs are a scattered few, hawking their numbers about on diverse threads but receiving nothing but scorn for their efforts. A quick look at RAWK reveals two whole threads full to the brim with BELLENDS , and they're only the ones we know about from the links posted on a few pages here. I have a 600 page dossier should you wish too know more.

I like the RAWKish level of effort you put into that, bravo sir.

 

[Minimeister]

Welcome home Mario.