Even if you excuse his comments as based on genuine emotion brought on by the vile treatment of the victim how about his actions since their acquital?He didn't take that ad out during the trial, and the ad didn't specifically say they (the five) should be executed, just that the people who carried it out should be. He did however say he thought they were guilty, which is daft but that case is so horrifying its probably down in the three hundred or four hundred most offensive things said about it.
It's *almost* as if his motivations aren't on the level.Even if you excuse his comments as based on genuine emotion brought on by the vile treatment of the victim how about his actions since their acquital?
During the campaign he said "They admitted they were guilty. The police doing the original investigation say they were guilty. The fact that that case was settled with so much evidence against them is outrageous."
What evidence he doesn't say, he just says they are guilty of the rape and other unspecified acts - how is that the due process he demands for Porter, Ailes, Roy Moore?
NYPD saying it is non-hazardous according to BBC. Going to hospital was a precaution.I see his daughter in law opened a letter containing some form of powder that made her nauseous and has been hospitalised........
I see his daughter in law opened a letter containing some form of powder that made her nauseous and has been hospitalised........
Not only are there multiple inaccuracies in this tweet, prime among them not noting that in 2010 the Dream act died in the Senate due to Republican fillibuster, but also "Republicans want to fix DACA more than Democrats" is going to come as a hell of a surprise to most of his "anti-amnesty" supporters.
This is an awful idea on multiple levels
More admin overhead, less choice and harder work for the recipient, food allergies or other diet needs could make a box unusable and no fresh fruit/veg will add to health issues.
Saving money on food for poor kids but sure we can find cash for a bloody stupid parade.
It's also not a $1.5 trillion deal in any way shape or form, when you look into it.Ah the "infrastructure" plan has shown it's true purpose.
"The $1.5 trillion infrastructure proposal would give the interior secretary the authority to approve natural gas pipelines that cross the country’s national parks, changing the requirement that Congress authorize such projects.
The plan also aims to speed up the time that a state has to issue water permits - “section 401” certificates required under the federal Clean Water Act - needed for the construction of interstate natural gas pipelines."
I, for one, am shocked.
This administration is a combination of the worst impulses of Trump's nationalism and the "establishment" GOP's urge not to have the government spend money, and CERTAINLY not on anyone who needs assistance.It's actually quite mad, we DESPERATELY need a complete overhaul of almost everything regarding transportation.
I honestly don't see what their end game is besides "make everyone rich richer". If it's that then they could REALLY be a bit *more* subtle about it.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.