Stock market resembling a ski course in the winter Olympics.
Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon
- Thread starter kithnou
- Start date
- Status
I just can't imagine getting to the point where I label use of the terms "minority" and "female" as crass. It's beyond me.
Playing the semantic or literal word card may provide you with a bit of succor but we both know who is being intellectually dishonest.
Someone who says he/she tends to dismiss the moral arguments of the left but complains about his/her religious beliefs being disliked by "the left" is, well, to put if bluntly, being hypocritical.
I don't have all day to dig in to it for you but I found the example you used within the context of the discussion, to be crass. Not hugely offensive, probably not even wrong, just not very subtle or sensitive, hence, crass.
Yea, hard to tell if it's just venting air from a dangerously big bubble or reacting to something larger.
It's timing with the replacement of Janet Yellen has to be more than coincidence tho.
BirkenheadBlue
Player Valuation: £70m
Probably would have carried a little more weight coming from someone who hadn’t just voted to grow the deficit by 1.5 trillion
This is round two and you're still failing (likely purposefully) to frame what I said accurately. Why don't we just cut it out, and you say what you mean?
I'm not above hypocrisy, I just fail to see how you've identified any.
"lacking sensitivity, refinement, or intelligence."
Explain how my comments fit in with that, when you have the time, please
I'm not sure how to frame it more directly or to explain it to someone who is, likely purposefully, claiming they don't understand what I am saying. But I will try:
Person P says he/she tends to dismiss morality of the left
Person P makes virtually identical claim regarding his own moral compass and the view of the left regarding same
In an effort to claim the second is not true, Person P engages in semantics or falls back on the "I didn't literally say that word" despite it being the clear intent of the words that were used.
Dude (or dudette, I don't know), we are all guilty at times. Glad you own that you are not above it.
Me: I have a limit on the amount of moral pitches I'll listen to from the left
Also me: We're all used as political fodder by our party and the opposite party (guns and religion)
It's not that important, but I just have no idea what I'm being called out on at this point.
OK, you implied that Blue TX had no faith, I found that to be lacking in both sensitivity and intelligence.
You disputed that and continued with a post about female minorities working at fox. I didn't question the validity of your post but coming hot on the heels of your last post, I pointed out its lack of sensitivity, which I stand by.
The first one I get, even though my intent was to convey that it's a tired argument often used by people who aren't religious.
The second one I don't get. Seems like it's just a kneejerk reaction to the idea of tokenism, which is weird considering it's FNC and if anyone is going to defend them, it would seemingly be me.
the second one was more of a reaction to the post straight after your flat denial, also being insensitive. Right, gotta take my snowflake ass outa here and try and get some work done before heading to NOLA for Madi Gras!
Laissez les bons temps rouler!
I am officially a bleeding heart liberal.
Searched for a skiing crash gif as a funny response.
They're awful, not funny and I can't post one.
- Status