This is a rant entirely disconnected to anything I've said. But it's a routine, "I may not have faith, but I'm willing to use yours against you" trope, which is a trite and inherently flawed argument.
Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon
- Thread starter kithnou
- Start date
- Status
This is a rant entirely disconnected to anything I've said. But it's a routine, "I may not have faith, but I'm willing to use yours against you" trope, which is a trite and inherently flawed argument.
If the argument is that the current right will cast off anyone who speaks ill of Trump, while the left will take in any of the castoffs and disingenuously promote them, we're in agreement.
Did you or did you not say that you dismiss moral arguments of the left?
Why would you presume to know whether I have faith or not? That. mate, is flawed argument.
You were doing pretty well till you made this crass judgement.
Indeed. As will the current left cast off anyone who speaks ill of (name liberal icon/belief) and the right take in any of the castoffs and disingenuously promote them.
Welcome to partisan politics.
Hence it being a trope. And hence me saying "may." I don't dismiss all moral arguments of the left.
This began, of course, with you attempting to call out my faith in an effort to serve your political agenda.
Not crass.
This is vile demagoguery
If you're a good looking minority/female who claims to have been a liberal, you can make a nice living over on FNC.
also crass
You tend to dismiss moral arguments of the left. That was your statement. You also said something about being persecuted for owning guns and your religion. I am correctly pointing out your hypocrisy.
Funny thing is, I'm making far less of political statement than I am a religious one.
I laughed out loud.
Labeling the referencing of Fox's exploitation of female/minority conservatives as "crass" is the epitome of leftist insanity.
Please identify where I said I was persecuted. I mentioned attributes in the context of political parties exploiting the natures of the people they represent or oppose. Intellectually dishonesty in the context of trying to point out hypocrisy is an interesting tactic, but I question the effectiveness.
1. You whole argument was based around him fulfilling a campaign promise regarding the wall.
2. The vast majority of America overwhelmingly support DACA including the president.
3. My point about Bumfudge, Alabama is Trump could have easily had a rally talking about how he got Dems to bend over and that he got everything he wanted. Bigly winning and all that.
It's all about context. Glad you're amused.
- Status