So let's get this stright, you think Trump winning was down to racism and a backlash against Obama who won twice and got most of the swing voters that Clinton lost? A lot of the same people who voted for Obama twice decided to vote for Trump in 2016 because they were angry that the black guy won? That's one bizzare sense of racism America must have. "The black guy was ok by me for two elections but now im mad and this white lady, oh she's beyond the pale!"
Trump won because people didn't like Hillary Clinton, simple as that and no amount of spin will change it. Any other even half competent Democrat leader would of walked an election against Trump easily. FFS the gut said four or five things a week during that campaign that would of torpedoed anyone else's campaign and still Clinton lost! She is 100% the reason Donald Trump is President of the United States.
@LinekersLegs @DanEFC92 @abelard I notice yous (among others) post a lot in this thread and it's always negative towards Trump. Have any of you also pro-actively posted about the above story? Or do you have any comment on it?
Thanks man,Great post, Ruairi. While there's room for debate in a few of these, others are pretty cast-iron and damning for Trump.
Do you think this is intentional leadership or is the Trump Doctrine merely chaos?
Thanks man,
As I was typing I realized a few were open to debate.
I think what we see on twitter is Trump, I think none of his policy stuff is him. There are a whole lot of unsavory types in DC making hay while the sun shines and as long as Trump continues to keep the media gaze off them with his stupid tweets, the better for them.
So I think it's intentional chaos and trump is an unwitting puppet.
A very dangerous game to play.
I also think Mike Pence has a huge part to play in all of this.
It should calm down by any normal standards, but theres nothing normal about all of this.Aye, it's very much Bush Jr again when the shots were called by those around him (poison like Cheney & Rumsfeld). Interesting theory of yours that Trump's tweets are a tactic (however intentional) to take the attention away from his men.
Well, this tactic is certainly working! I said earlier the mainstream media, and the many thousands of anti-Trump online commenters, are paying him far too much attention. Your theory is the best reason why this should calm down that I've heard yet.
)valiant effort, but he's not worth it mate. it's like punching water... as soon as you withdraw your fist, it just flows right back in
I disagree it's borderline WUM, I'm saying that in debate if you want to say X is damaging, and X is also damaging, then you would have to explain why you think that. It's not the opponent's prerogative to have to explain it for him.
I personally just think he's a narcissistic sociopath and a disgusting human. I've never see or heard anything else to convince me otherwise. It's nothing to do with any media bias.Another problem in modern debating is dismissing your opponent before he has even replied.
It betrays an absolute faith in one's own opinion and total rejection of a dissenting view.
Black-&-whiteism. The bane of diplomacy.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.