Jose Andres has been superb throughout this crisis, if anyone wants to donate here is the link to his organisation https://www.worldcentralkitchen.org/donate
Not only are there still significant issues, three weeks later, with access to the basics such as clean water, food and medical care (especially in the more remote areas) there are worrying signs of disease with several suspected deaths due to leptospirosis.
I think Cruz would be handling it at least a bit better, if for no other reason than he'd be cognizant of the risk to his re-election if large numbers left the island for Florida. However my loathing of Cruz (apparently shared on a nonpartisan basis in the Senate) means that even that minimal praise of him leaves me feeling uncomfortable.
Meanwhile Trump is attacking Puerto Rico again
When should he? Right as they're dealing with the worst disaster to hit the island in 100 years?TBF Trump isn't attacking Puerto Rico, he is attacking the local government - and he should, because for at least the last twenty years (and almost certainly much longer than that) they have been absolutely awful. They are after all the main reason why the society it is their job to manage has collapsed to an extent not seen anywhere else affected by these disasters.
Strongly disagree, there are still huge numbers of people lacking the basics such as access to clean water, enough food to survive and medical care - the focus of the federal government and thus the president should be on improving their dire conditions.TBF Trump isn't attacking Puerto Rico, he is attacking the local government - and he should, because for at least the last twenty years (and almost certainly much longer than that) they have been absolutely awful. They are after all the main reason why the society it is their job to manage has collapsed to an extent not seen anywhere else affected by these disasters.
When should he? Right as they're dealing with the worst disaster to hit the island in 100 years?
Strongly disagree, there are still huge numbers of people lacking the basics such as access to clean water, enough food to survive and medical care - the focus of the federal government and thus the president should be on improving their dire conditions.
Once the critical period is over, I think it a very valid discussion to have about the administration and decisions that led to being particularly vulnerable to the disaster but even then it should be directed at those responsible rather than a generalized slur to a whole population.
In these events there are almost always actions by local/regional government that made the situation more prone to danger. For instance in the Harvey flooding there are questions about whether natural floodplains-water spillways should have been allowed to be built on https://www.dallasnews.com/news/har...s-recede-houston-homeowners-find-nature-blame.
If Irma had hit Tampa it would likely have been devastating
https://www.washingtonpost.com/grap...mate-change/?tid=a_inl&utm_term=.1a3996d20874
Prior to a disaster hitting is the best time to discuss these issues, I would genuinely welcome for instance if Trump wants to question whether California is prepared for a major earthquake on the San Andreas as I don't think it is. The second best is at the start of the rebuilding phase as that is the point that lessons learnt can be best applied. However during the emergency response phase I think it counter productive to saving lives and just an all round disgusting thing to do as president.
I don't think it is as by starting an argument about the existing governance, most particularly with the San Juan mayor but also in general, it immediately puts up barriers between FEMA and the local politicians. You had the FEMA director go on tv and say he "filtered out the San Juan mayor's complaints as political noise" - that can't be helpful to anyone.Isn't that basically just the NRA argument though? Mass shootings are a time for thoughts and prayers, and it's wrong to politicise them by discussing gun control?
I think this is the perfect time to discuss why Puerto Rico has been so poorly run for so long, because it is probably the only time that Puerto Rico will ever be discussed in the United States (which barely even knows about its own jurisdiction), and the only time there will ever be any impetus to do anything constructive. If we wait until the crisis subsides, then the possibility of, say, debt relief or modifying the Jones Act will be nil.
And it seems like a false dichotomy to suggest that FEMA doing its job properly can't occur alongside raising awareness of what has made Puerto Rico (or Houston) so susceptible.
That is not to edify Trump though - he is not "attacking the local government," which he does not understand well enough to form a cogent critique; rather, he is picking a personal fight imbued with racist insinuations with the mayor of San Juan specifically, who, whatever her party's record, has been extremely energetic and committed to helping her constituents, and to demanding that the federal government - ie: Trump - do its job. And in any case, the reason why PR has been so badly managed has at least as much to do with Washington and Wall Street as it does with the island's relatively weak leadership.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.