Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
Barbarism knows no equivalence........just nutters demolishing statues.......

And money is just little bits of metal, and water is just oxidised hydrogen and the bible is just a book.

See? Take context away and the world suddenly becomes a simpler place!!

By the way, what does 'Barbarism' mean to you? To me, it's a lack of or abnegation of culture, an out and out renouncement. Which doesn't fit at all with what we are seeing; an evolution, a development in thought; exclusive to inclusive, rejection to acceptance, hate to love. As schmaltsy and idealistic as it sounds, it's what's happening. Only the blinkered don't want to see that.
 
Trump has yet to name a head of FEMA or NOAA although that may mean the person in charge is career tract not political/appointed so maybe they know what they are doing.

...and if they don't, he can blame Obama because it's not his appointee
 
v2v2-SaddamStatueIraq.jpg


Barbarians

etc etc etc

War invariably produces images such as this. However, statues which have been accepted for hundreds of years, which are now deemed by some pc snowflakes as inappropriate because it's hurts their newfound sensibilities, deserves a bit more respect. If this is the sum of your argument, getting rid of Saddam, or Hitler or whoever, then you have lost the plot...
 
Trump has yet to name a head of FEMA or NOAA although that may mean the person in charge is career tract not political/appointed so maybe they know what they are doing.

...and if they don't, he can blame Obama because it's not his appointee
Tbf he has named a FEMA head and thankfully, unlike Bush, seems someone with good experience
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/08/trumps-fema-director-doesnt-seem-incompetent.html
he was the head of the Alabama Emergency Management Agency, and Hurricane Program Manager at FEMA before that

As you say nobody at NOAA though and seems like going to underfund the agency which will significantly reduce their abaility to help forecast.
 
Tbf he has named a FEMA head and thankfully, unlike Bush, seems someone with good experience
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/08/trumps-fema-director-doesnt-seem-incompetent.html
he was the head of the Alabama Emergency Management Agency, and Hurricane Program Manager at FEMA before that

As you say nobody at NOAA though and seems like going to underfund the agency which will significantly reduce their abaility to help forecast.

Ah...good. I just remembered there wasn't one at the start of hurricane season and hadn't heard about the confirmation. Surprised. That usually gets noticed on local news around here.
 
War invariably produces images such as this. However, statues which have been accepted for hundreds of years, which are now deemed by some pc snowflakes as inappropriate because it's hurts their newfound sensibilities, deserves a bit more respect. If this is the sum of your argument, getting rid of Saddam, or Hitler or whoever, then you have lost the plot...


First of all, it is a war. An on-going one. And people have even been killed. Beginning with the Civil War and continuing with the shooting of black Church members by that racist teenager, and continuing with the systemic and can't-be-attributed-to-chance shooting of black people by white cops, the latter who are routinely judged not guilty. And on and on and on. "pc snowflake"...seriously, how [Poor language removed] dare you.
 
War invariably produces images such as this. However, statues which have been accepted for hundreds of years, which are now deemed by some pc snowflakes as inappropriate because it's hurts their newfound sensibilities, deserves a bit more respect.

So the objection to the violent subjugation of a race is now a newfound sensibility, and these statues have been accepted for hundreds of years yetwere only erected in the 1900's? Do you read your musings before you post them?

Give it up. The horse has bolted, this 'contrarian' point of view is no longer funny.
 
War invariably produces images such as this. However, statues which have been accepted for hundreds of years, which are now deemed by some pc snowflakes as inappropriate because it's hurts their newfound sensibilities, deserves a bit more respect. If this is the sum of your argument, getting rid of Saddam, or Hitler or whoever, then you have lost the plot...

You're the one comparing them to ISIS (ffs).
 
First of all, it is a war. An on-going one. And people have even been killed. Beginning with the Civil War and continuing with the shooting of black Church members by that racist teenager, and continuing with the systemic and can't-be-attributed-to-chance shooting of black people by white cops, the latter who are routinely judged not guilty. And on and on and on. "pc snowflake"...seriously, how [Poor language removed] dare you.

Well, putting aside your language, it is not a war, or you do not understand what war is. War is not some philosophical debate between like minded liberals over a glass of wine, war involves the killing of a great many soldiers who are doing the bidding of the same liberal minded politicians. Intelligent people, and I assume you to be one, should assume responsibility to diffuse violence and one sided debate. If this is really what the US intelligentsia has come to then you are screwed. Just buy a gun a shoot people........
 
war involves the killing of a great many soldiers who are doing the bidding of the same liberal minded politicians.

What? Really?


1. A state of armed conflict between different countries or different groups within a country.

2. A state of competition or hostility between different people or groups.
"she was at war with her parents"

3. A sustained campaign against an undesirable situation or activity.

These definitions are all wrong then? Or do you mean 'The definition of war, which I've just made up, and which suits my argument is...'?

Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, even Churchill, all liberal-minded? Have a good tug on the one with bells on.
 
Last edited:
Intelligent people, and I assume you to be one, should assume responsibility to diffuse violence and one sided debate.

Are you comfortable that one side of the debate carries swastikas? Do you think reasoned debate would see that nazi flag go in the bin?

Is it not an act of violence to parade around with a flag, espousing doctrine from what is considered the greatest force for evil in modern European history?

The POTUS is intelligent because he lets people feel it's ok to carry swastikas?

Oh, I forgot. Many fine people were there to make up for the naughty boys.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top