Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
dylsexicbleu said:
Yes, a biased judge and a jury pool made up of those who are roughly 80% automatically opposed to you is a recipe for a tainted trial. The legal system will ultimately side with me, just as they concluded the Southern legal system was tainted against blacks.
Click to expand...

All he needed was 1 person on the jury to believe in him, so if 80% of the jury were all biased against him (you have zero proof of this lol) that still left 20% of unbiased people which was more than enough to make him not guilty. Turns out this mythical non biased 20% figure you made up also thought he was guilty.
 
Ruairi77 said:
5 of 12 voted for Trump in 2020. He just needed to convince one of them that he didnt break the law.
He couldn't.
edit - he didnt even have to convince one of them he didnt break the law, he just had to convince one of them that he might not have. He couldnt even do that.

This is nothing like Alabama in the 60's and to claim it is, or even think it is is to have no understanding of what black people suffered in this country in the 1960s. The vast majority of black people were not legally allowed to vote in Selma in 1962.

Maybe you're just racist.
Click to expand...
Derp State loves making highly offensive comparisons to famous cases involving African Americans because he doesn't understand what thinking is. He also called the demographic that comprises DEI "2nd rate". We know where he stands.
 
Last edited:
Zatara said:
Why bring race into this? How random and obtuse.

If the judge was green and the defendant was orange ( lol )...

...the judge hated everything about the orange person. The way he looked, the way he spoke, his friends, the way he does business, all his beliefs...hated the very essence of the orange person.

The trial was not driven by anyone or anything but his green friends. All of his green friends that he would see at partys and events for many years to come.

How could he hold his head up high if the orange man was found innocent?


Does this sound like an unbiased trial, an unbiased judge...

...anything remotely neutral?
Click to expand...
Says the boy who makes light of Palestinian children being slaughtered for no reason other than, well, you know….
 
Last edited:
I'm very confused. I thought Trump's legal troubles were due to the Deep State. But now it seems that the outcome of one of his criminal trials (3 more criminal trials are pending) was due to a jury comprised of New Yorkers, of which some had actually voted for Trump and at least one got all their news from X and Truth Social. So is the Deep State actually New Yorkers and Trump voters?...or is there some even more diabolical 3rd party entity that is behind all this, like the Super Deep Deep State? I would normally ask GOT's resident Deep State clown about this, but he's probably cooking up another racist post about DEI, so I guess I'll just have to figure it out myself by doing research on YouTube.
 
$200 million in donations to the Trump campaign since the guilty verdict. 30% of donors had never previously donated to Trump. This, I think, correlates with my argument that his base is now motivated beyond belief. But hey, Dems wanted a few cheap headlines at Trump's expense.
 
dylsexicbleu said:
No, the judge CAN matter. I don't know whether this is a jury trial, I assume it will be. Delaware is something like 60% Dem at the last election. That's a huge ingrained advantage for any Dem defendant. Last election NY was massively Dem. That's a huge ingrained disadvantage for any Republican defendant. It's like trying a black man in Selma, 1962. You are not going to get a jury of 12 non-partisan peers.
Click to expand...

Poor Trump is the 2024 Rosa Parks in your eyes.
 
dylsexicbleu said:
$200 million in donations to the Trump campaign since the guilty verdict. 30% of donors had never previously donated to Trump. This, I think, correlates with my argument that his base is now motivated beyond belief. But hey, Dems wanted a few cheap headlines at Trump's expense.
Click to expand...

That`ll help pay his legal bills, the big fine that`s coming his way, silencing the next porn star who pops out of the woodwork and for the private army he`s going to have to hire, to stop all those DEM assassination attempts.
 
dylsexicbleu said:
$200 million in donations to the Trump campaign since the guilty verdict. 30% of donors had never previously donated to Trump. This, I think, correlates with my argument that his base is now motivated beyond belief. But hey, Dems wanted a few cheap headlines at Trump's expense.
Click to expand...
We'll see how accurate this is when campaign finance reports are filed. Coming from Eric Trump, as this is, the claim could be as inflated as the Trumps' self-reported net worth.

In any event, how much is going to pay his legal bills? Seems weird a "billionaire" uses campaign donations to pay for personal legal expenses.
 
dylsexicbleu said:
$200 million in donations to the Trump campaign since the guilty verdict. 30% of donors had never previously donated to Trump. This, I think, correlates with my argument that his base is now motivated beyond belief. But hey, Dems wanted a few cheap headlines at Trump's expense.
Click to expand...

JsgDmZa.png


Must be true, there's no way someone named Trump would go around inflating numbers for a desired effect.

And it doesn't seem like anyone else but the Daily Mail are running this number currently, just pulled directly from his interview with Bartiromo on Fox. That would be the Mail, that isn't considered a credible source for wikipedia editors. More like Woke-ipedia I guess, amiright?

And even if actually true, so what? If it's his base that are extra motivated, who cares? They weren't voting for Biden regardless.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

→ Log in 🔑 Register
🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top