Guilty of being a legend, right?He's only guilty of serving the American people. Hero.
Guilty of being a legend, right?He's only guilty of serving the American people. Hero.
Read Comey's public letter. He's twisting himself into knots as to why he recommends not prosecuting Clinton. Her server didn't even have Gmail level of security. I'd say her private server security was not much better than the security of posting top secret intel stuff via pm on this site. Still, Clinton got a sweetheart decision of barely a reprimand.Is this why Clinton didn’t get locked up? Or was she innocent or something?
Sheesh. Of course Durham(he wasn't even investigating the entire agency) didn't find the entire agency was politically biased. No-one is seriously claiming every FBI agent and every FBI dept is biased. However, enough of the agents who were investigating Trump were either a) biased, or b) incompetent.
I don't think I've thrown the term conspiracy or theory around in this thread. I personally don't care if it's called CT, confirmation bias, incompetent or whatever. The fact is serious wrongdoings went on in the FBI concerning an investigation into Trump and his campaign. Some of these wrongdoings appear to have been committed hand in glove with the Dem campaign. For four years the Trump administration was hamstrung over an investigation that had no legal justification. Nothing to see here though folks, just a 'whoopsie' from the culpable parties and let's move on!
He is one of the few people who has taken a financial hit for holding public office. Most of the rest go from somewhere approaching upper middle class at the start of their political careers to multimillionaires. Some into the dozens or hundreds of millions.He's only guilty of serving the American people. Hero.
Guilty of being a don juan, with good looks and a massive brain.Guilty of being a legend, right?
Yes, but what would someone who actually knows say?Read Comey's public letter. He's twisting himself into knots as to why he recommends not prosecuting Clinton. Her server didn't even have Gmail level of security. I’d say her private server security was not much better than the security of posting top secret intel stuff via pm on this site. Still, Clinton got a sweetheart decision of barely a reprimand.
Read Comey's public letter. He's twisting himself into knots as to why he recommends not prosecuting Clinton. Her server didn't even have Gmail level of security. I'd say her private server security was not much better than the security of posting top secret intel stuff via pm on this site. Still, Clinton got a sweetheart decision of barely a reprimand.
Get over itRead Comey's public letter. He's twisting himself into knots as to why he recommends not prosecuting Clinton. Her server didn't even have Gmail level of security. I'd say her private server security was not much better than the security of posting top secret intel stuff via pm on this site. Still, Clinton got a sweetheart decision of barely a reprimand.
Basically this. Let’s just enjoy both their demiseLads. I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that the gormless fool you are trying to explain basic facts to is not going to be convinced. He is in love with the tangerine man-baby and love makes men do strange and illogical things
Desperately flailing to come up with a message to use.
The FBI were using what the knew was Clinton campaign document, taking it as evidence to a FISA court, and not telling the judge it was opposition research. You don't think this little fact is relevant to a judge? The FBI were also using news reports they knew that came from the document and using this to once again bring to a FISA court.And those agents were given due punishment for being incompetent or biased. How was the Trump administration hamstrung? None of the wrongdoings "appear to have been committed hand in glove with the Dem campaign" (as you stated above), as the Durham report states (page 98) regarding the "Clinton Plan:" "it did not yield evidence sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that any FBI or CIA officials intentionally furthered a Clinton campaign plan to frame or falsely accuse Trump of improper ties to Russia." Footnote 393 of the Durham report is also relevant, as it states that negative claims about a political opponent are routine and not illegal in and of themselves.
So I really don't find your claim to be consistent with the [Durham] report you brought when you claimed, "Nah, no way I'm believing the FBI were playing with a straight bat with regards to Trump. Call it a conspiracy, confirmation bias or whatever you wish. It's their thumb on the scales to undermine Trump, his campaign and his administration" on the previous page. Campaigns routinely try to smear each other, but I still don't see how this "hamstrung" Trump's administration once he was elected.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.