RINO
lol
lol
What else is woke?
You people are just so weird.I'd say many conservatives and RINO's are as anti-Trump as the moderate left. Pointing to person X being conservative in no way minimises their potential anti-Trump bias. The Bush and John McCain clans are second to no-one when it comes to hating Trump and his brand of populism. You can add Romney to the list. Time after time the intel community have sided on the anti-Trump side.
This from the AP:
'according to Durham, the FBI rushed into the probe without having any evidence that anyone from the Trump campaign had had any contact with any Russian intelligence officers. It identifies by name the Russia experts in the FBI and other agencies who were never consulted before the investigation was begun and says that had they been, they would have said there was no information pointing to a conspiracy between Russia and the campaign.'
continued
'The report contends that the FBI fell prone to “confirmation bias,” repeatedly ignoring, minimizing or rationalizing away evidence that undercut the premise of collusion, including a conversation in which Papadopoulos vigorously denied knowing about any cooperative relationship between Russia and the Trump campaign.'
'It also says investigators did not corroborate a “single substantive allegation” in a dossier of Democratic-funded research that was compiled by a former British spy, Christopher Steele, and yet continued to cite it in applications to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to eavesdrop on a former Trump campaign aide, Carter Page.'
Nah, no way I'm believing the FBI were playing with a straight bat with regards to Trump. Call it a conspiracy, confirmation bias or whatever you wish. It's their thumb on the scales to undermine Trump, his campaign and his administration.
Or someone with absolutely nothing to contribute to the thread.Yes,when it's tucker carlson this is the right response
I'd say many conservatives and RINO's are as anti-Trump as the moderate left. Pointing to person X being conservative in no way minimises their potential anti-Trump bias. The Bush and John McCain clans are second to no-one when it comes to hating Trump and his brand of populism. You can add Romney to the list. Time after time the intel community have sided on the anti-Trump side.
This from the AP:
'according to Durham, the FBI rushed into the probe without having any evidence that anyone from the Trump campaign had had any contact with any Russian intelligence officers. It identifies by name the Russia experts in the FBI and other agencies who were never consulted before the investigation was begun and says that had they been, they would have said there was no information pointing to a conspiracy between Russia and the campaign.'
continued
'The report contends that the FBI fell prone to “confirmation bias,” repeatedly ignoring, minimizing or rationalizing away evidence that undercut the premise of collusion, including a conversation in which Papadopoulos vigorously denied knowing about any cooperative relationship between Russia and the Trump campaign.'
'It also says investigators did not corroborate a “single substantive allegation” in a dossier of Democratic-funded research that was compiled by a former British spy, Christopher Steele, and yet continued to cite it in applications to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to eavesdrop on a former Trump campaign aide, Carter Page.'
Nah, no way I'm believing the FBI were playing with a straight bat with regards to Trump. Call it a conspiracy, confirmation bias or whatever you wish. It's their thumb on the scales to undermine Trump, his campaign and his administration.
Yup, totally weird to expect some sort of consistency from the intel services and DoJ. It's shocking that I should expect bureaucrats not to lie to a court so they can spy on a Presidential campaign.You people are just so weird.
I mean this in the most serious way I can - please get help. There is still time to be saved
You shouldn't be so harsh on yourself,I think once you've done a bit of reading you'll be fine,good luckOr someone with absolutely nothing to contribute to the thread.
But that would suggest that these people don't actually believe what they are saying and are just grifters?Folks, hate to break it to you...Tucker Carlson is also in on the witch hunt! In referring to Trump he wrote:
"We are very, very close to being able to ignore Trump most nights. I truly can’t wait," he texted an unidentified person.
"I hate him passionately. ... I can’t handle much more of this," he added.
This is like an onion, the more you peel, the more it stinks!!
![]()
Oh the ironyYup, totally weird to expect some sort of consistency from the intel services and DoJ. It's shocking that I should expect bureaucrats not to lie to a court so they can spy on a Presidential campaign.
Sheesh. Of course Durham(he wasn't even investigating the entire agency) didn't find the entire agency was politically biased. No-one is seriously claiming every FBI agent and every FBI dept is biased. However, enough of the agents who were investigating Trump were either a) biased, or b) incompetent.Clinesmith, the agent who lied, was tried and convicted. Two others were acquitted. That's how it works. The Durham report didn't find an overall political bias in the entire agency, which is what you seem to keep claiming ("the FBI") as if it's some monolithic Borg-type single mind. There are agents who likely hate Trump and there are agents who likely hate Clinton. Those who broke the law or procedures were punished, as the Durham report shows.
When I see the Durham report, which was authored by a Republican, I don't just cry "witch hunt, witch hunt, witch hunt" with my fingers in my ears because I don't like the conclusion. I don't unflaggingly cry "conspiracy conspiracy" at every turn in the face of increasing evidence of wrong-doing for a candidate that I support. I don't cry "but whatabout so-and-so" when one of the politicians I might have voted for has been indicted or found guilty. But you and many other MAGA-folks, do. This is really weird and cultish. The Durham report simply shows how government is supposed to work: if people mess up, they get investigated and if they are found to be in the wrong, they get punished. For example, if Hunter Biden is found guilty of some shady stuff, then he should be punished. It's really not that difficult. There is no witch hunt conspiracy going on, except in your head.
Also, Tucker Carlson is a RINO, yes?
Sheesh. Of course Durham(he wasn't even investigating the entire agency) didn't find the entire agency was politically biased. No-one is seriously claiming every FBI agent and every FBI dept is biased. However, enough of the agents who were investigating Trump were either a) biased, or b) incompetent.
I don't think I've thrown the term conspiracy or theory around in this thread. I personally don't care if it's called CT, confirmation bias, incompetent or whatever. The fact is serious wrongdoings went on in the FBI concerning an investigation into Trump and his campaign. Some of these wrongdoings appear to have been committed hand in glove with the Dem campaign. For four years the Trump administration was hamstrung over an investigation that had no legal justification. Nothing to see here though folks, just a 'whoopsie' from the culpable parties and let's move on!
He's only guilty of serving the American people. Hero.What do you think about Trump’s current indictment, leaving aside FBI bias, the Biden crime family, Hilary’s emails, and the views of Tucker Carlson; do you think he’s guilty of the crimes he’s been charged with?
Is this why Clinton didn’t get locked up? Or was she innocent or something?Yup, totally weird to expect some sort of consistency from the intel services and DoJ. It's shocking that I should expect bureaucrats not to lie to a court so they can spy on a Presidential campaign.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.