Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
Exactly, the bolded bit alone justifies at least one forensic audit.

If that reveals nothing, then it will be time to shut up.

And no, of course we shouldn't be going back to 2000, or even 2016/18. Just the 2020 one. Just one single forensic audit on one county. That's all.

That in itself should not be too much to ask the Dems to accept. Tho' I recognise you & many others have reservations as to the neutrality/seriousness of the auditors. But first, let's see what they pull out the bag, and how seriously we should take it.

for argument's sake, Legs...what if they really do find evidence of fraud? Actual real indisputable evidence? For example by way of tens-of-thousands of fake mail-in votes. Just for argument's sake...what then?
Why the hell should more Democrats using mail in voting justify a forensic audit - they are Americans too why should their votes be more worthy of checking than Republicans?!!! And lots of Democrats already vote by mail in Oregon - if any test was needed it has been passed for decades.

And it won’t be “just one”, even if they don’t find anything in this one (even with all the hijinks and never before used ”tests”) there will be calls to roll out to other states “just to check”.

The most bitter election of recent years will drag on with more and more people on both sides losing faith in the election process furthering already large divisions. I didn’t even support the stupid recount that Jill Stein did in 2016

I believe this audit is so flawed it is impossible for them to find what I would consider evidence of fraud. Given the copious ones that I did feel were handled professionally found not a scrap of evidence I feel the concept that there are tens of thousands of fake votes a desperate grasp of imaginary straws by people who can’t admit they lost.
 
Why the hell should more Democrats using mail in voting justify a forensic audit - they are Americans too why should their votes be more worthy of checking than Republicans?!!! And lots of Democrats already vote by mail in Oregon - if any test was needed it has been passed for decades.

And it won’t be “just one”, even if they don’t find anything in this one (even with all the hijinks and never before used ”tests”) there will be calls to roll out to other states “just to check”.

The most bitter election of recent years will drag on with more and more people on both sides losing faith in the election process furthering already large divisions. I didn’t even support the stupid recount that Jill Stein did in 2016

I believe this audit is so flawed it is impossible for them to find what I would consider evidence of fraud. Given the copious ones that I did feel were handled professionally found not a scrap of evidence I feel the concept that there are tens of thousands of fake votes a desperate grasp of imaginary straws by people who can’t admit they lost.

I for one supported Stein's recount.

Re: Maricopa, we're at the wait 'n see stage then. I don't believe that whatever they uncover it will get past the courts saying it's "moot".
 
Rasmussen: Trump’s favorite polls because they are notoriously inaccurate with a significant right bias.

Yeah, it's such a biased poll and they purposely word their questions somewhat amorphously so as to later spin it into a right-leaning message. You have to pay/subscribe to see their raw data. But you know, mr. left-leaning "independent thinker" dholliday is just posting unbiased centrist stuff...just like when he posts tweets by Jack Posobiec or a the distinctly anti-muslim Clarion project (sigh)
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top