Why the hell should more Democrats using mail in voting justify a forensic audit - they are Americans too why should their votes be more worthy of checking than Republicans?!!! And lots of Democrats already vote by mail in Oregon - if any test was needed it has been passed for decades.Exactly, the bolded bit alone justifies at least one forensic audit.
If that reveals nothing, then it will be time to shut up.
And no, of course we shouldn't be going back to 2000, or even 2016/18. Just the 2020 one. Just one single forensic audit on one county. That's all.
That in itself should not be too much to ask the Dems to accept. Tho' I recognise you & many others have reservations as to the neutrality/seriousness of the auditors. But first, let's see what they pull out the bag, and how seriously we should take it.
for argument's sake, Legs...what if they really do find evidence of fraud? Actual real indisputable evidence? For example by way of tens-of-thousands of fake mail-in votes. Just for argument's sake...what then?
And it won’t be “just one”, even if they don’t find anything in this one (even with all the hijinks and never before used ”tests”) there will be calls to roll out to other states “just to check”.
The most bitter election of recent years will drag on with more and more people on both sides losing faith in the election process furthering already large divisions. I didn’t even support the stupid recount that Jill Stein did in 2016
Jill Stein's election recount ends as Wisconsin finds 131 more Trump votes
After weeks of legal wrangling yielded only one electoral review, Wisconsin found that Donald Trump’s margin of victory over Hillary Clinton had increased
I believe this audit is so flawed it is impossible for them to find what I would consider evidence of fraud. Given the copious ones that I did feel were handled professionally found not a scrap of evidence I feel the concept that there are tens of thousands of fake votes a desperate grasp of imaginary straws by people who can’t admit they lost.
