Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

[Barry Rathbone]

He actually did provide that to you. You've just skirted around that fact (not the only fact(s) you've skirted around, by the way).

You avoided the salient word "doom" in your highlight like a pro .... what a player!!

Do at least try and focus such slipperiness is why survey after survey shows worries about man mate climate buffoonery waaaay down sane people's list of concerns.

On something you might understand did you read I had sausage casserole earlier? - superb

 

[Barry Rathbone]

#triggered

#Demolished

 

[Barry Rathbone]

I'm gonna repost this every page...

Of course there are no actual peer reviewed scientific journals that prove man made climate change is fiction. Just like he never asked all the "name" climate scientists to send him peer-reviewed papers. And just like he won't address how and why computer models are bad; he just repeats tropes from a climate-change denial blog and says things like "coupled nonlinear chaotic system" as if to make it sound like he knows what he's talking about. He has NO idea what a "coupled nonlinear chaotic system" means. He somehow thinks ice-core data is the sine qua non upon which global warming evidence is based, and when you provide him with what he asks for (I provided him with a peer-reviewed paper that he asked for), he responded with a graph from a blog run by a TV weather personality, where the graph itself was made by a massage therapist who has taken money from the Heartland Institute. I'm not making this up. If I provide him with another peer-reviwed paper, he'll just find a way to say it was "modeled" or that it doesn't have his artificial and pointless requirement of ice core data (spoiler alert: Ice core data requires some model transformations, and ice core data has revealed an association between temperature and CO2 in industrial times) or suggest that there is an agenda-driven cabal of scientists who conspire to hide the truth (of which Barry Rathbone happens to be privy of). More simply, no need to waste your time with him as he has all the answers whereas all those thousands of scientists who have actual expertise--for example, those who understand what the phrase "coupled nonlinear chaotic system" means--are obviously just wrong. And of course, he's quick to suggest ad hominen if you describe his reasoning as poor or fallacious--this is all part of his perceived role as the calm but easily-aggrieved truth-teller who is happy to put forth numerous spurious and tendentious arguments but retreats quickly into calls of ad hominem when his arguments are refuted. Textbook Dunning-Kruger conspiracy theory territory here, nothing more.

Yeh, keep posting that it avoids the killer request for non modelled peer reviewed papers I stipulated and fits in with cult tactic#101 - avoid the killer question at all costs. Indulge yourself echo chamber gospel seems big on this thread. Good to see you making good on your "return to topic" bluff, lol

Btw I might post the above each time you try this avoidance ... then again I might do something else, see how I feel.

 

[verreauxi]

Good to see you making good on your "return to topic" bluff, lol

As before, your reading skills are poor. I said folks could point to my post whenever you yammer on with your tiresome agenda. Which is exactly what has happened.

 

[McBain]

#Demolished

Barry, you choose to get your information from wattsupwiththat.com, a mouthpiece bought and paid for by the fossil fuel industry. It continually misleads readers on subjects such as the reliability of the U.S. surface temperature record. It's right-wing manifesto is to deny climate change is man made, despite all evidence.

You've bought into this pseudoscience, hook, line and sinker. Lets hope you haven't reproduced yet.

Leak exposes how Heartland Institute works to undermine climate science

Libertarian thinktank keeps prominent sceptics on its payroll and relies on millions in funding from carbon industry, papers suggest

www.theguardian.com

WattsUpWithThat hypes itself with most discredited web metric (hits!) and keeps smearing scientists while demanding others “dial back the rhetoric”

The NYT’s Virginia Heffernan now “regrets” being duped by Watts

thinkprogress.org

This Is How A Bogus Climate Story Becomes Unstoppable On Social Media

A British newspaper admitted that a controversial climate article from February was misleading and inaccurate. The story’s claims have received at least 752,300 shares, likes, comments, or other interactions on social media.

www.buzzfeednews.com

#nincompoop

 

[Barry Rathbone]

I started this nearly 20 pages ago and the evidence requested still hasn't appeared - who knew??

Well I did actually and said so numerous times.

I'm going to close this down now my echo chamber chums for 2 obvious reasons.

Firstly, my boredom threshold (and dare I say neutral readers) has been breached.

Secondly, I have irrefutably demonstrated that no observational robust science demonstrating man made climate doom exists and the Trumpster administration was spot on to call it out as unadulterated nonsense. However, I must confess that my unimpeachable (casting pearls before swine here) demolition of climate loons has yet again produced the disturbing and pitiful sight of fundamentalists circling wagons in desperation. The huddling and consoling of each other like frightened puppies is really quite a distressing sight, I feel almost remorseful - guilty even.

Do you know I'm nearly in tears here,

 

[Prevenger17]

Loool. Amazing closing statement from Baz there. I think that we can all agree that Obama memes and wattsupwiththat.com have been a devastating one-two punch to the great climate hoax.

 

[summerisle]

I started this nearly 20 pages ago and the evidence requested still hasn't appeared - who knew??

Well I did actually and said so numerous times.

I'm going to close this down now my echo chamber chums for 2 obvious reasons.

Firstly, my boredom threshold (and dare I say neutral readers) has been breached.

Secondly, I have irrefutably demonstrated that no observational robust science demonstrating man made climate doom exists and the Trumpster administration was spot on to call it out as unadulterated nonsense. However, I must confess that my unimpeachable (casting pearls before swine here) demolition of climate loons has yet again produced the disturbing and pitiful sight of fundamentalists circling wagons in desperation. The huddling and consoling of each other like frightened puppies is really quite a distressing sight, I feel almost remorseful - guilty even.

Do you know I'm nearly in tears here,

Take it to the :

https://www.grandoldteam.com/forum/threads/climate-change.107344/

and stop clogging up the thread ; it was tedious days' ago, now it's mind-numbingly boring in the extreme.

 

[Toffee in Jandals]

I started this nearly 20 pages ago and the evidence requested still hasn't appeared - who knew??

Well I did actually and said so numerous times.

I'm going to close this down now my echo chamber chums for 2 obvious reasons.

Firstly, my boredom threshold (and dare I say neutral readers) has been breached.

Secondly, I have irrefutably demonstrated that no observational robust science demonstrating man made climate doom exists and the Trumpster administration was spot on to call it out as unadulterated nonsense. However, I must confess that my unimpeachable (casting pearls before swine here) demolition of climate loons has yet again produced the disturbing and pitiful sight of fundamentalists circling wagons in desperation. The huddling and consoling of each other like frightened puppies is really quite a distressing sight, I feel almost remorseful - guilty even.

Do you know I'm nearly in tears here,

Thank goodness for that. Given you'll no longer be posting on this thread, I suggest you use the spare time you've gained to have a read of this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change_denial

 

[McBain]

I started this nearly 20 pages ago and the evidence requested still hasn't appeared - who knew??

Well I did actually and said so numerous times.

I'm going to close this down now my echo chamber chums for 2 obvious reasons.

Firstly, my boredom threshold (and dare I say neutral readers) has been breached.

Secondly, I have irrefutably demonstrated that no observational robust science demonstrating man made climate doom exists and the Trumpster administration was spot on to call it out as unadulterated nonsense. However, I must confess that my unimpeachable (casting pearls before swine here) demolition of climate loons has yet again produced the disturbing and pitiful sight of fundamentalists circling wagons in desperation. The huddling and consoling of each other like frightened puppies is really quite a distressing sight, I feel almost remorseful - guilty even.

Do you know I'm nearly in tears here,

 

[verreauxi]

I started this nearly 20 pages ago and the evidence requested still hasn't appeared - who knew??

Well I did actually and said so numerous times.

I'm going to close this down now my echo chamber chums for 2 obvious reasons.

Firstly, my boredom threshold (and dare I say neutral readers) has been breached.

Secondly, I have irrefutably demonstrated that no observational robust science demonstrating man made climate doom exists and the Trumpster administration was spot on to call it out as unadulterated nonsense. However, I must confess that my unimpeachable (casting pearls before swine here) demolition of climate loons has yet again produced the disturbing and pitiful sight of fundamentalists circling wagons in desperation. The huddling and consoling of each other like frightened puppies is really quite a distressing sight, I feel almost remorseful - guilty even.

Do you know I'm nearly in tears here,

I just want to make sure you know how much I have appreciated your contributions over these 20 pages or so. And I say sincerely that you have convinced me about the hoax of global warming.

 

[verreauxi]

By the way, best multi so far, at least in 2019. Terry Nodder is still my top.

 

[McBain]

By the way, best multi so far, at least in 2019. Terry Nodder is still my top.

Is it @davek ?

 

[Ollie d]

I think Baz has proved beyond doubt his evidence from reputable websites and you guys should back off. Climate change is naturally occurring, it doesn't rain all day every day does it? #pseudoscience #Michael Fish

 

[RAFUH]