Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

[Barry Rathbone]

on a scale of one to 10, with 10 being the most robust and 1 being the least robust, just how robust would you say the science is in that link?

Sorry about this old chum but I'm going to have to put you on ignore.

Just reading back I have only just noticed your continual "jump ins" adding absolutely nothing beyond a weird reference to Top Gear. Hopefully someone can give you the attention you so desperately crave because you really do seem wound up.

Take care now

 

[longers]

You can just feel that boomer energy radiating off Barry

View attachment 75073

#boomermemes

 

[Moomin]

You can just feel that boomer energy radiating off Barry

He puts up a photo of teenage girl to defend his point of view.

Rather strange.

 

[Prevenger17]

He puts up a photo of teenage girl to defend his point of view.

Rather strange.

They're all weirdly obsessed with that girl, the whole thing is very creepy imo

 

[JimmyJeffers]

He puts up a photo of teenage girl to defend his point of view.

Rather strange.

He’s now putting everyone on ignore who is challenging his pseudoscience. I would worry for the guy as he clearly has issues but you reap what you sow I’m afraid.

 

[Walken]

Sorry about this old chum but I'm going to have to put you on ignore.

Just reading back I have only just noticed your continual "jump ins" adding absolutely nothing beyond a weird reference to Top Gear. Hopefully someone can give you the attention you so desperately crave because you really do seem wound up.

Take care now

I've actually thoroughly enjoyed seeing you embarrass yourself, will continue to read with glee

 

[verreauxi]

on a scale of one to 10, with 10 being the most robust and 1 being the least robust, just how robust would you say the science is in that link?

It's a decent meta-analysis published in a respectable journal.

 

[Toffee in Jandals]

Radware Bot Manager Captcha

Loads of peer reviewed papers cited in there saying the same thing too. What does wattsupwiththat.com say?

There's lots of big words in that article Prev. I think you've confused poor Bazz and that's why he's been unable to mount a comeback.

 

[JimmyJeffers]

There's lots of big words in that article Prev. I think you've confused poor Bazz and that's why he's been unable to mount a comeback.

Probably one of the dumbest posters in recent times. Throws in words like ‘robust’ and ‘obfuscation’ in amongst his drivel in order to make himself sound like he has a clue what he’s talking about.

 

[Barry Rathbone]

He puts up a photo of teenage girl to defend his point of view.

Rather strange.

How illuminating that the idea of said teenage girl acting as official mouthpiece for the climate doom point of view has gone right over your head.

Admittedly it was comic genius to use the word "strange" ironically but your rationale has descended so low as to be subterranean although it does explain the ease with which "the Donald" is wiping the floor with your ilk.

Hey, here's a novel idea why not post the requisite peer reviewed evidence I've been asking for to prove you're not just another "jumps in" merchant looking for attention.

Go 'ed, chucky give it a shot

 

[Barry Rathbone]

There's lots of big words in that article Prev. I think you've confused poor Bazz and that's why he's been unable to mount a comeback.

No, he's on ignore he lost his chance I'm afraid by continually failing to provide the requisite non modelled peer reviewed evidence for man made climate doom and obfuscating like a drugged up tool. He's been stalking me in desperation ever since.

I feel so sorry for him but he was warned.

 

[Toffee in Jandals]

No, he's on ignore he lost his chance I'm afraid by continually failing to provide the requisite non modelled peer reviewed evidence for man made climate doom and obfuscating like a drugged up tool. He's been stalking me in desperation ever since.

I feel so sorry for him but he was warned.

He actually did provide that to you. You've just skirted around that fact (not the only fact(s) you've skirted around, by the way).

 

[McBain]

Would that be data they tried to hide, the manipulated temp data or robust satellite and platinum standard data from USCRN showing nothing beyond natural variability?

You see it all depends what data you choose whether you end up with spoof or real science my uneducated little blusterer

Just a tad more anger and inanity about a topic you have absolutely no idea about and you can become a full member of cult climate doom like the other strange people. Imagine how you can justify getting off your skull every night because you believe we've got less than 12yrs left, no more scolding from mommy.

The whole canard has become so desperate as a result of no observational science for man made climate doom the recent Madrid climate conference has gone down the toilet amidst acrimony and infighting leaving only a school girl with Asperger's stamping her feet. There is no case for man made co2 catastrophe

Keep kicking them in the nads, Donald (keeping it on topic right there,)


View attachment 75179

#triggered

 

[verreauxi]

I'm gonna repost this every page...

Of course there are no actual peer reviewed scientific journals that prove man made climate change is fiction. Just like he never asked all the "name" climate scientists to send him peer-reviewed papers. And just like he won't address how and why computer models are bad; he just repeats tropes from a climate-change denial blog and says things like "coupled nonlinear chaotic system" as if to make it sound like he knows what he's talking about. He has NO idea what a "coupled nonlinear chaotic system" means. He somehow thinks ice-core data is the sine qua non upon which global warming evidence is based, and when you provide him with what he asks for (I provided him with a peer-reviewed paper that he asked for), he responded with a graph from a blog run by a TV weather personality, where the graph itself was made by a massage therapist who has taken money from the Heartland Institute. I'm not making this up. If I provide him with another peer-reviwed paper, he'll just find a way to say it was "modeled" or that it doesn't have his artificial and pointless requirement of ice core data (spoiler alert: Ice core data requires some model transformations, and ice core data has revealed an association between temperature and CO2 in industrial times) or suggest that there is an agenda-driven cabal of scientists who conspire to hide the truth (of which Barry Rathbone happens to be privy of). More simply, no need to waste your time with him as he has all the answers whereas all those thousands of scientists who have actual expertise--for example, those who understand what the phrase "coupled nonlinear chaotic system" means--are obviously just wrong. And of course, he's quick to suggest ad hominen if you describe his reasoning as poor or fallacious--this is all part of his perceived role as the calm but easily-aggrieved truth-teller who is happy to put forth numerous spurious and tendentious arguments but retreats quickly into calls of ad hominem when his arguments are refuted. Textbook Dunning-Kruger conspiracy theory territory here, nothing more.

 

[Walken]

No, he's on ignore he lost his chance I'm afraid by continually failing to provide the requisite non modelled peer reviewed evidence for man made climate doom and obfuscating like a drugged up tool. He's been stalking me in desperation ever since.

I feel so sorry for him but he was warned.

Baz has a size 42 waist and his facebook profile picture is a motor bike