Thanks, I'll take a look at it
Yea, but didn't he get just under 50% of the vote ?
Mind you, the poll may well include folk who couldn't be arsed voting because both candidates were so poor.
46% at the current count.
Coincidentally I think only Obama has got more votes than Hilary in the History of the United States.
I've no problem with you criticising Trump or doing what you want but if you criticise him for being the worst at something (eg sexual transgressions or being warmongering) and I don't think he is the worst in those areas then I will say so
Coincidentally I think only Obama has got more votes than Hilary in the History of the United States.
That's the result of population growth.
Not entirely.
Yes entirely.
Trump is in 3rd place in the all-time rankings, more than Reagan, Bill Clinton, all yer Bushes etc.
Purely as a result of population growth, of course contemporary candidates will on average gain more votes, give or take the odd little spike (2008 was an exceptional turnout % for example).
Carter and Reagan elections had similar turnout % to Trump/Clinton but altogether totalled around 40 million less votes.
That's because every 4 years there's more people living in US than ever before...population growth.
Just because there are more people doesn't mean more will vote. So that is not entirely true. There is more to it than just population growth. See 2012 election vs 2008.
give or take the odd little spike (2008 was an exceptional turnout % for example).
if nothing else, the CIA complaining about a foreign intelligence agency conspiring to install a right-wing strongman is amusing to no end...
I don't think you read my reply to you, cheesy
When's the next change.org coming out?
put Hilary in the White House as after Obama she's got more votes than anyone else in history!
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.