Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
One thing hey....when FBI probed Hillarys server Comey stated that there might have been hacking but they couldnt get clear evidence of who actually did it...

Why did russians did proper hacking then and now they kinda....well....

Cmoon guys do the math
 
I was referring to illegals voting.
What proof is there of this happening? Let alone in the millions that Trump is claiming.

You seem concerned that some vague claims about Russians being involved in Wikileaks which affect faith in election results yet completely unconcerned about the future president saying you can't trust the election figures from the most populous state in the country.
 
I went to see a guy called Paul Richards speak at my workplace the other week. He wrote a book "How to be a spin doctor"

He gave us a quick talk about the importance of spin and examples of where it had not been used well like Gerald Rattner famously stating he could only sell his products so cheap because "they were crap" (which his company never recovered from).

At the end of the talk I asked Paul Richards about Donald Trump who seemed to break every rule of what one shouldn't say but became US president. He (Paul) said he was going to have to rewrite his book because of this (Trump)!
 
Where do you get your figures for this assertion?

I haven't got any figures its an opinion but I can remember there were several women came out of the woodwork re Clinton (just like with Trump) and it is my inference (reasonable I believe) that a young impressionable intern would be star struck working for the president and easily influenced into carrying out sexual activity with him when deep down it was not what she wanted. I am saying that Clinton in effect groomed Lewinsky and almost certainly others in an abuse of power.

My main motivation in posting on here (as on the Brexit Thread) is not to say I would have voted for Trump (I wouldn't have done) but to say don't see everything as black and white, one side good the other bad, look at things with care and look underneath and behind what you are reading to get a more rounded picture. Sorry if that sounds arrogant or lecturing
 
I haven't got any figures its an opinion but I can remember there were several women came out of the woodwork re Clinton (just like with Trump) and it is my inference (reasonable I believe) that a young impressionable intern would be star struck working for the president and easily influenced into carrying out sexual activity with him when deep down it was not what she wanted. I am saying that Clinton in effect groomed Lewinsky and almost certainly others in an abuse of power.

My main motivation in posting on here (as on the Brexit Thread) is not to say I would have voted for Trump (I wouldn't have done) but to say don't see everything as black and white, one side good the other bad, look at things with care and look underneath and behind what you are reading to get a more rounded picture. Sorry if that sounds arrogant or lecturing

I doubt anyone here is. It is generally agreed that Clinton was a horrible candidate for the job, but was the preferred choice due to being the least worse, as opposed to the best choice. FWIW I really do not like her, and would never defend her. She is vile.
 
I doubt anyone here is. It is generally agreed that Clinton was a horrible candidate for the job, but was the preferred choice due to being the least worse, as opposed to the best choice. FWIW I really do not like her, and would never defend her. She is vile.
I don't find her vile and have nothing really against her as a person but as far as I'm aware she has been quite warlike up to now in having the US kill a lot of people and I cant support that.

And as I say I'm wanting to expose the hypocrisy and say to anti trump, anti brexit people it really isn't as one sided as you seem to think it is
 
I went to see a guy called Paul Richards speak at my workplace the other week. He wrote a book "How to be a spin doctor"

He gave us a quick talk about the importance of spin and examples of where it had not been used well like Gerald Rattner famously stating he could only sell his products so cheap because "they were crap" (which his company never recovered from).

At the end of the talk I asked Paul Richards about Donald Trump who seemed to break every rule of what one shouldn't say but became US president. He (Paul) said he was going to have to rewrite his book because of this (Trump)!

I think Adam Curtis's latest documentary Hypernormalistion on BBC iPlayer explains it pretty well, that came out a few weeks before the US election but talked why he was successful.
 
I don't find her vile and have nothing really against her as a person but as far as I'm aware she has been quite warlike up to now in having the US kill a lot of people and I cant support that.

And as I say I'm wanting to expose the hypocrisy and say to anti trump, anti brexit people it really isn't as one sided as you seem to think it is

Your 'expose' is silly, and nonsensical. Just because people are criticising the President-elect does not mean we're with Hilary. You can bet your bottom dollar that I am not going to desist in criticising President-elect Snowflake.
 
I've no problem with you criticising Trump or doing what you want but if you criticise him for being the worst at something (eg sexual transgressions or being warmongering) and I don't think he is the worst in those areas then I will say so
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top