I agree to a point...however a president that mocks the disabled and makes racially charged comments legitimises those comments and will increase instances of racism/disability hate crime etc
Agreed mate. Those comments really were deplorable
I agree to a point...however a president that mocks the disabled and makes racially charged comments legitimises those comments and will increase instances of racism/disability hate crime etc
What proof is there of this happening? Let alone in the millions that Trump is claiming.I was referring to illegals voting.
Blimey, he's only just been voted in ffs !
Americans are plainly even more fickle than Evertonians.
tbf it's not surprising is it? Most voters didn't vote for him.
For me Clintons sexual transgressions were probably a lot worse than Trumps being more hidden and involving a greater amount of grooming of vulnerable interns etc.
Where do you get your figures for this assertion?
I haven't got any figures its an opinion but I can remember there were several women came out of the woodwork re Clinton (just like with Trump) and it is my inference (reasonable I believe) that a young impressionable intern would be star struck working for the president and easily influenced into carrying out sexual activity with him when deep down it was not what she wanted. I am saying that Clinton in effect groomed Lewinsky and almost certainly others in an abuse of power.
My main motivation in posting on here (as on the Brexit Thread) is not to say I would have voted for Trump (I wouldn't have done) but to say don't see everything as black and white, one side good the other bad, look at things with care and look underneath and behind what you are reading to get a more rounded picture. Sorry if that sounds arrogant or lecturing
I don't find her vile and have nothing really against her as a person but as far as I'm aware she has been quite warlike up to now in having the US kill a lot of people and I cant support that.I doubt anyone here is. It is generally agreed that Clinton was a horrible candidate for the job, but was the preferred choice due to being the least worse, as opposed to the best choice. FWIW I really do not like her, and would never defend her. She is vile.
I went to see a guy called Paul Richards speak at my workplace the other week. He wrote a book "How to be a spin doctor"
He gave us a quick talk about the importance of spin and examples of where it had not been used well like Gerald Rattner famously stating he could only sell his products so cheap because "they were crap" (which his company never recovered from).
At the end of the talk I asked Paul Richards about Donald Trump who seemed to break every rule of what one shouldn't say but became US president. He (Paul) said he was going to have to rewrite his book because of this (Trump)!
I don't find her vile and have nothing really against her as a person but as far as I'm aware she has been quite warlike up to now in having the US kill a lot of people and I cant support that.
And as I say I'm wanting to expose the hypocrisy and say to anti trump, anti brexit people it really isn't as one sided as you seem to think it is
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.