Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
View attachment 32245

Tries to resist temptation to turn this thread into"Leaders Wives"...Fails and therefore posts Dianne Abbott - no; Michelle O - yes (though David Icke probably thinks she is a Lizard like Barack...)


Michelle yes, Diane no, Cheryl no, Samantha yes, Melania yes, Laura no


I like some David Icke, so @Clint Planet wasn't that far off with his remark earlier. I like his arguments when he talks about real stuff, tho' don't always agree. And I enjoy when he talks about cosmic philosophy (acid is a hell of a drug). I don't have much time for his lizard aliens thing, but understand that to be a stunt to get people flocking.
 
Michelle yes, Diane no, Cheryl no, Samantha yes, Melania yes, Laura no


I like some David Icke, so @Clint Planet wasn't that far off with his remark earlier. I like his arguments when he talks about real stuff, tho' don't always agree. And I enjoy when he talks about cosmic philosophy (acid is a hell of a drug). I don't have much time for his lizard aliens thing, but understand that to be a stunt to get people flocking.

Agree about Icke. Gonna post more about him in the conspiracy theories thread sometime.

His lectures certainly can feel like a bit of a trip.

Be interesting to see if he thinks Trump is a Lizard since he thinks the Bushes, Clintons and Obamas are.
 
Re. the Russian influence.

I doubt very much this had much, if any bearing on the result.
Mark my words it's nothing significant. This story is full of assumptions and circumstancial evidence tops.


White House, 25th November 2016

"We believe our elections were free and fair from a cypersecurity perspective"



December 9th
NY Times: "Russia hacked into republican commitee but kept data"
Washington Post: "Secret CIA assessment says Russia was trying to help Trump win White House"

-> Chief Strategist & Communications Director Sen Spencer: " RNC was not hacked. NY Times were told but they chose to ignore it"
 
Mark my words it's nothing significant. This story is full of assumptions and circumstancial evidence tops.


White House, 25th November 2016

"We believe our elections were free and fair from a cypersecurity perspective"



December 9th
NY Times: "Russia hacked into republican commitee but kept data"
Washington Post: "Secret CIA assessment says Russia was trying to help Trump win White House"

-> Chief Strategist & Communications Director Sen Spencer: " RNC was not hacked. NY Times were told but they chose to ignore it"
Why would the CIA make it up lol...your posts on him are becoming comical
 
Why would the CIA make it up lol...your posts on him are becoming comical

Hi, I don't know the truth of this either way but please don't be so naive to believe that the CIA wouldn't make something up or that everything we are told at our end is always true and the Russians are always bad
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top