Donald Trump for President Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Because I'm not cowed by extremely isolated incidents. I'm infinitely more likely to be killed on my bike cycling around London than I am by any terrorist attack. It's a completely non-issue, and certainly for vast swathes of the country.

First of all you need to produce an actual statistic to be taken remotely seriously.

Secondly, you're comparing something which is out of your control, to something which they potentially can control, but you're just choosing not to control. Additionally, it seems odd to ignore anything which can saves lives, just because its statistically less likely to happen. Anyway, as @Prevenger17 pointed out, there's far more too it than just security concerns.
 
Clinton represented continuity and big business, she had nothing new to offer.

Even though I was increasingly astounded hour by hour like most others watching, Trumps victory really isn't all that surprising.

It was a straight headcount of mostly the white underclass vs. everybody else (and the celebrities), and Trump still got the core Republican vote out.

It was a billionaire offering change, but change nonetheless, as faux and dubious as it is.

What he manages to do for the constituency that voted for him, if anything, is another matter altogether.

I thought to myself I would have considered voting for him if I was there, given the desperate choice available. Particularly if I was unemployed or in low-paid, unsecure employment, or elderly. What easy prey.

No wonder scores of people wouldn't admit their voting intentions to pollsters, or to a liberal media that regards them as racist and backward.

For a lot of people now the prospect of high-risk change is better than stale continuity and same old same old.

Politicians have hijacked the centre and consensus/middle-ground politics has just been reduced to ensuring economic stability at the expense of the vulnerable.

Nothing is done that would risk alienating the markets, investors, vested interests, and/or minorities. Yet this is presented as advocating for middle-class interests, and "hard-working families" that new Labour was aimed at. Look where that ended up.
 
First of all you need to produce an actual statistic to be taken remotely seriously.

Secondly, you're comparing something which is out of your control, to something which they potentially can control, but you're just choosing not to control. Additionally, it seems odd to ignore anything which can saves lives, just because its statistically less likely to happen. Anyway, as @Prevenger17 pointed out, there's far more too it than just security concerns.

Well, there are typically around 10-15 cycling fatalities in London per year, or 113 in Britain as a whole, with a proportionally higher chance of some kind of injury. That compares to the solitary murder of Lee Rigby this decade.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top