It came from
@Saint Domingo s post in the Forest thread.
My point is
we didn't spend a lot of money when you compare our spending around our peers in the league.
It was the 13th highest spend and we apparently have the 13th highest valued squad. It was less than the median investment in the league. A top half or 7-12th finish
is outperforming that investment.
You can look at any chart for squad valuation this year and they all show us where? In the bottom half.
14th here
This is the page for the Premier League, with an overview of fixtures, tables, dates, squads, market values, statistics and history.
www.transfermarkt.us
15th here
💶 19. Burnley: €187 million 💰 11. Nottingham Forest: €444 million 🤑: 3. Liverpool: €1.01 billion
www.givemesport.com
16th here
Detailed Market Values of Season 2025/26 for England Premier League. We show you the statistics for all 20 teams.
footystats.org
If you were OK with Dyche mildly outperforming the 19th place valuation and used it to defend him not doing any better than 16th last year, then why are we using the investment as a stick against Moyes?
I won't even acknowledge the joke of trying to include 100 million in it for Grealish.