Hinchcliffe's Corner
Player Valuation: £50m
Imagine Holliday?
Current Affairs Coronavirus Thread - Serious stuff !!!
- Thread starter bullybeef
- Start date
- Status
Moderna's two-in-one flu and Covid vaccine passes advanced trial
The trial suggests the jab arms the body with protective antibodies as effectively as separate shots.
www.bbc.co.uk
Paris
What is love?
Crikey
Excerpt:
"There are so many errors in this short paper that it's hard to know where to start," Meyerowitz-Katz wrote.
The first obvious issue, he told MedPage Today, is "that the paper itself is entirely based on previous work." Researchers copied the methods from an influential 2021 paper,opens in a new tab or window published in eLife, by Ariel Karlinsky, a PhD student at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Israel, and Dmitry Kobak, PhD, a research scientist at the University of Tübingen in Germany, Meyerowitz-Katz said. That paper has been cited by organizations like the United Nations and CDC, he added.
"They re-analyzed it badly, and then they published it as novel work, which is extremely problematic," Meyerowitz-Katz noted.
Karlinsky has called foropens in a new tab or window The BMJopens in a new tab or window to "retract the paper, open an inquiry, share results, make sure this doesn't happen again, and publicly apologize" -- and other experts have echoed that callopens in a new tab or window.
www.medpagetoday.com
"There are so many errors in this short paper that it's hard to know where to start," Meyerowitz-Katz wrote.
The first obvious issue, he told MedPage Today, is "that the paper itself is entirely based on previous work." Researchers copied the methods from an influential 2021 paper,opens in a new tab or window published in eLife, by Ariel Karlinsky, a PhD student at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Israel, and Dmitry Kobak, PhD, a research scientist at the University of Tübingen in Germany, Meyerowitz-Katz said. That paper has been cited by organizations like the United Nations and CDC, he added.
"They re-analyzed it badly, and then they published it as novel work, which is extremely problematic," Meyerowitz-Katz noted.
Karlinsky has called foropens in a new tab or window The BMJopens in a new tab or window to "retract the paper, open an inquiry, share results, make sure this doesn't happen again, and publicly apologize" -- and other experts have echoed that callopens in a new tab or window.
BMJ Paper at Center of COVID Vax Deaths Controversy Gets Expression of Concern
Experts say paper was riddled with bad science
www.medpagetoday.com
Willie Thorne
Player Valuation: £5m
Did anyone else enjoy the first lockdown? Personally I thought it was great. Something different, furloughed for three months on full pay in the best summer weather we've had for years, getting jobs done around the house, BBQ's etc.
Looking back, so surreal. 'Elbows up!'
Looking back, so surreal. 'Elbows up!'
Some people are more accustomed to being cabined up than others. If your social circle is erm, less than desirable then some time away from the relentless moaning and cryarsing was probably a blessing. The other end of the spectrum was much more noticeable in that those who liked to strut and show off found their lives so empty that they fell apart rather quickly. Reckon a lot of it can be found in what respectively you* see when you look in the mirror.
Lockdown imposed a significant reduction in options, just the lessened choice affected some, others that are allergic to books, or amusing themselves, were just lost. There does seem to be a groundswell of animosity towards that entire chapter. And it has become more vocal.
I wasn't overly arsed, besides having Carlo running the show and James left foot to enjoy, my life was/is hardly the stuff of billionaire playboys/girls anyhow.
Did put some weight on though, and wasn't exactly stick thin to start with.
Billy Dean
Player Valuation: £70m
Yeah I enjoyed the first one. 2nd one was horrid though.
Module 1 Report - The resilience and preparedness of the United Kingdom UK Covid-19 Inquiry Archives
A report by The Rt Hon the Baroness Hallett DBE, Chair of the UK Covid-19 Inquiry on the resilience and preparedness of the United Kingdom, dated 18 July 2024.
covid19.public-inquiry.uk
This is the report into the resilience and preparedness of the United Kingdom module 1.
The key findings are:
- It wasn't a 'Black Swan' event and was entirely predictable
- The pandemic had a disproportionate impact on Britons who were poorer or from an ethnic minority, with a “higher likelihood of sickness and death”.
- The UK prepared the wrong pandemic
- No contact tracing system was in place
- Local planning was undermined by inadequate centralised government response.
- Lessons weren't learned from previous viral outbreaks.
Module 1 Report - The resilience and preparedness of the United Kingdom UK Covid-19 Inquiry Archives
A report by The Rt Hon the Baroness Hallett DBE, Chair of the UK Covid-19 Inquiry on the resilience and preparedness of the United Kingdom, dated 18 July 2024.
This is the report into the resilience and preparedness of the United Kingdom module 1.
The key findings are:
- It wasn't a 'Black Swan' event and was entirely predictable
- The pandemic had a disproportionate impact on Britons who were poorer or from an ethnic minority, with a “higher likelihood of sickness and death”.
- The UK prepared the wrong pandemic
- No contact tracing system was in place
- Local planning was undermined by inadequate centralised government response.
- Lessons weren't learned from previous viral outbreaks.
Absolute whitewash.
I did control F, and didn’t find one mention of 5G.
My family & I have just had covid - it's nasty - keeps coming back 14 days it takes for a clear test & you still feel crap - had all our jabs too - a new variant ?
New variants being made hourly Joey lad.
Lol, that'll get the conspiracy crew nutters going.Excerpt:
"There are so many errors in this short paper that it's hard to know where to start," Meyerowitz-Katz wrote.
The first obvious issue, he told MedPage Today, is "that the paper itself is entirely based on previous work." Researchers copied the methods from an influential 2021 paper,opens in a new tab or window published in eLife, by Ariel Karlinsky, a PhD student at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Israel, and Dmitry Kobak, PhD, a research scientist at the University of Tübingen in Germany, Meyerowitz-Katz said. That paper has been cited by organizations like the United Nations and CDC, he added.
"They re-analyzed it badly, and then they published it as novel work, which is extremely problematic," Meyerowitz-Katz noted.
Karlinsky has called foropens in a new tab or window The BMJopens in a new tab or window to "retract the paper, open an inquiry, share results, make sure this doesn't happen again, and publicly apologize" -- and other experts have echoed that callopens in a new tab or window.
BMJ Paper at Center of COVID Vax Deaths Controversy Gets Expression of Concern
Experts say paper was riddled with bad science
Huge shame that the BMJ family of journals don't operate open peer reviewing, which BMC journals do (or certainly used to, it's been a while...). Would be interesting to see who reviewed it and any comments.
Yes mate, my wife has just got over a bout. It really knocked her around and she was devoid of energy for a week and a half after the main symptoms stopped/tested negative.
Don’t tell Dave.
He’s got his homemade PPE, bike and megaphone, mothballed and ready to go at the drop of a hat.
- Status