Cooping everyone up, then opening the floodgates all at once, is not the way. At least we were smart enough to re-open by degrees, so that we didn't break the health care system over our collective knee. We strained it pretty hard a few times, but nothing like what they're likely to face.
I suspect the objective is demonstrating that the nanny surveillance state knows best, and that any casualties are considered necessary fallout by the politicians.
Is a good point this. People tend to forget the point of lockdowns. To stop health services being completely overwhelmed by unmanageable waves of admissions.
In the UK, they told us this every day, showing the data of hospital admissions, explaining the lag between new case numbers, hospital admissions and deaths, etc, but many now are just saying “well lockdowns didn’t stop the virus spreading, so were completely pointless, and we’ve damaged our economies for nothing”.
Amazing how quickly people forget.
