oh I know, I'd personally base it absolutely all on negative tests. I'm just saying, there's only one way to get the isolation period down for staff. Locking down does not do that, I don't know why people are acting like it will.
Testing is the only the way mate, you should be clear before retuning 100%. I think the virus is to variable to put an arbitrary number on it to be honest and if you do there should be a fail safe in it, I wouldn’t be minimising it. One of the hardest thing to hold working in the area with frail patients, is knowing you yourself are a ticking time bomb and a potential risk to them. It’s a hard thing to hold and you feel at times a heavy responsibility.
If I go to a patients room or bay, I have to sign, date and log time arrival and leving. Full scrubbed up, with surgical mask on all day. If I test positive, those patients are into 10 day isolation and testing themselves, often very stressful for them and their families - to say nothing of the damage to the therapeutic relationship with them when you come back, while more likely then not, the whole ward goes into lock down, staff stay in the one area and families aren’t allowed visit and everyone’s movements are restricted.
When you actually weigh it all up, the current staff isolation protocols is actually more respurcful, then thee resources and impact of a full on outbreak.