Current Affairs Coronavirus Thread - Serious stuff !!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
lol now it’s abundantly clear you aren’t even reading your own posts
Look at the language you're using..."abundantly clear".

Analysing the anti-Trump phenomenon, recognising some of the good work he's done, and acknowledging the vast support he has...these things aren't indicative of actually supporting him.

We used to call this kind of distinction nuance...but nuance is dead now.
 
Look at the language you're using..."abundantly clear".

Analysing the anti-Trump phenomenon, recognising some of the good work he's done, and acknowledging the vast support he has...these things aren't indicative of actually supporting him.

We used to call this kind of distinction nuance...but nuance is dead now.
Who killed nuance? Do the police know?

Shocking crime.
 
I fully support making things as difficult as possible for anti vaxxers. They shouldn't be allowed into any indoor venues. Supermarkets should only offer an outdoor click and collect or delivery service for these individuals as they are causing mass deaths and are dangerous.

And what's your source on the causing mass deaths bit?

@dholliday clearly anti vaxxers or hesitant non vaxxed or whatever rebranding name you're trying to add are causing mass spread and mass hospitisation.

If everyone in the UK was 'vaccine hesitant' we would still be under a lockdown and thats a fact. These people are absolute disgraces who are going to cause major problems for the NHS in the winter.

You said they're causing mass death.

What makes you say that?


Here is one example (of many) where my challenge remains unanswered.

Joe here will not post for a bit hoping this goes away, then return to this same opinion once I'm gone...and I am off after today for the rest of the year, you'll all be happy to know.


@tsubaki the above is an example of this being an echo chamber, as i'm the only one who challenged Joe on this. Without me, this extreme view would remain unchallenged. Hence: echo chamber.
 
It doesn't objectively prove that. You just have a different opinion on what those posts represent. I see mostly only minor-degree shifts. When I look at other Fora, I see a colossal 180° shift. Far more of a shift than anything I've ever posted (which I'd class around 45°-90° deviation from this thread's consensus).



Indeed. The picture is still being drawn.
If 180 shift is colossal, what's 45-90?

Large? Significant? Gigantic? Important to know.
 
Here is one example (of many) where my challenge remains unanswered.

Joe here will not post for a bit hoping this goes away, then return to this same opinion once I'm gone...and I am off after today for the rest of the year, you'll all be happy to know.
Excited to find out which chamber of Bro You Tube and Reddit you find your next red pill at when you return
 
Here is one example (of many) where my challenge remains unanswered.

Joe here will not post for a bit hoping this goes away, then return to this same opinion once I'm gone...and I am off after today for the rest of the year, you'll all be happy to know.

All available evidence points towards unvaccinated ending up in hospital and much more likely to die. I do not need to waste my time finding facts that are extremely obvious to anyone with any reading ability.

You are clearly an active anti vaxxer who is trying to use false narratives to cause confusion.
 
All available evidence points towards unvaccinated ending up in hospital and much more likely to die. I do not need to waste my time finding facts that are extremely obvious to anyone with any reading ability.
You said they are "causing mass deaths and are dangerous"

Your post above is now saying something different.


You are clearly an active anti vaxxer who is trying to use false narratives to cause confusion.
Quote my post...any one...which uses a false narrative.

And then quote any of my posts...any...which shows me as an anti-vaxxer.

You're essentially arguing points which do not exist. And like others on here, you do this to artificially bolster your own position. For if you attempted to argue my actual points, you will find your own view less convincing.


Debate has become all about being right, and not about learning. Not just GOT, but almost everywhere. I'm sure it wasn't always like this. Pre-2010, even pre-2015 debate was sound.
 
Objective evidence for this?
The significant volume of replies i keep getting.


lads, lasses...we're never gonna get close at this rate. At best, we're at the agree-to-disagree stage. I hope someone reading these last few days, or weeks, has found something useful, either way.

i really must be off...gonna post in the feel-good jazz thread, then will see you all next year...hopefully not amidst a heavy hospital crisis x
 
You said they are "causing mass deaths and are dangerous"

Your post above is now saying something different.



Quote my post...any one...which uses a false narrative.

And then quote any of my posts...any...which shows me as an anti-vaxxer.

You're essentially arguing points which do not exist. And like others on here, you do this to artificially bolster your own position. For if you attempted to argue my actual points, you will find your own view less convincing.


Debate has become all about being right, and not about learning. Not just GOT, but almost everywhere. I'm sure it wasn't always like this. Pre-2010, even pre-2015 debate was sound.

What should people be learning from anti vaccination viewpoints? You have even pointed towards the vaccine being in testing which is absolute nonsense and a clear sign of anti vax viewpoints.

I have looked at studies and their statistics and its extremely clear that vaccines are the easiest answer to the pandemic. This is based on real studies not social media posts.
 
Look at the language you're using..."abundantly clear".

Analysing the anti-Trump phenomenon, recognising some of the good work he's done, and acknowledging the vast support he has...these things aren't indicative of actually supporting him.

We used to call this kind of distinction nuance...but nuance is dead now.

You were banging on about Trump Derangement Syndrome a few days ago, so please don’t try and pretend you were coming up with some insightful critique of how Trump is in reality.
 
The significant volume of replies i keep getting.


lads, lasses...we're never gonna get close at this rate. At best, we're at the agree-to-disagree stage. I hope someone reading these last few days, or weeks, has found something useful, either way.

i really must be off...gonna post in the feel-good jazz thread, then will see you all next year...hopefully not amidst a heavy hospital crisis x
No, your absolute clarity that significant is the correct phrase. How have you evaluated the evidence of appropriateness of other nomenclature?

Sloppy work this, fella.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top