What's going on is you being a tit as always xsmall letters are acceptable
and this is why you don't understand what's going on.
What's going on is you being a tit as always xsmall letters are acceptable
and this is why you don't understand what's going on.
I am using the data provided by the government.
All I am doing is comparing two statistics and they are;
If vaccinated what is P(B|A) where A = you are infected and B is chance of death
If unvaccinated what is P(B|A) where A = you are infected and B is chance of death
This is one of many important statistics that must be considered when measuring effectiveness of vaccine.
I don't think I am being disingenuous with the data here, or trying to cherry pick anything, like I said this is the official gvmt data. If they release the % of people vaccinated then I can use that too, but they haven't.
I do read all the posts (within my active times, that is) and I don't agree there is a "wide variety of views".
He only reads his own posts and tries to slap a like on them for good measure.… which just proves you don’t read all the posts
I have already said that was the wrong phrasing to use.I know you are using the data from the government, and for the reasons already described you are wrong to draw the conclusion that you have.
Without knowing how many people are vaccinated you cannot say that the vaccine is essentially useless based solely on the number of cases and the number of deaths.
It doesn't objectively prove that. You just have a different opinion on what those posts represent. I see mostly only minor-degree shifts. When I look at other Fora, I see a colossal 180° shift. Far more of a shift than anything I've ever posted (which I'd class around 45°-90° deviation from this thread's consensus).… which just proves you don’t read all the posts
Indeed. The picture is still being drawn.Like I said it is one statistic out of many that helps us build a picture of effectiveness of vaccine.
It doesn't objectively prove that. You just have a different opinion on what those posts represent. I see mostly only minor-degree shifts. When I look at other Fora, I see a colossal 180° shift. Far more of a shift than anything I've ever posted (which I'd class around 45°-90° deviation from this thread's consensus).
You didn't name them, either. Neither did anyone else.You couldn’t apparently name the right wing posters on here a week ago
And that is the problem: instead of accepting I see things differently your brain simply denies that possibility, as it cannot compute this difference.and to pretend this is an echo chamber itself requires you to not recognise that there is a variety of opinion so I am quite confident that you don’t read all the posts.
You didn't name them, either. Neither did anyone else.
And that is the problem: instead of accepting I see things differently your brain simply denies that possibility, as it cannot compute this difference.
Have you seen this video?
Also I have seen that video, and as I’ve told you already I strongly suspect you haven’t - what it describes (in and amongst its vague anti-semitism) is exactly what you are doing here.
One perceptive comment under this video:
It's amazing to me to read the comments -- and how convinced both sides are that they are right and those on the "other side" are the gullible fools being manipulated.
incredible, really. it's like you read the posts, don't recall what they said, but save them in your head to become your own opinion. You've done this before a few times.
I already did...you denied it, naturally lolhave I? do tell
I already did...you denied it, naturally lol
i think we're done here.
What support of Trump? I'm on record here saying if I had a vote it would go Sanders or Gabbard...or third-party.do you really think anyone would watch that video and not come to the conclusion that your support of Trump would be relevant?
What support of Trump? I'm on record here saying if I had a vote it would go Sanders or Gabbard...or third-party.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.