leaving aside statistical significance at around 30 observations for a moment.
There is a difference between asking the question ‘of all hospital admissions for covid, what proportion is vaccinated v unvaccinated?’ and saying ‘given a sample of 1,000,000, how many vaccinated people will be hospitalised and how many unvaccinated people will be hospitalised’.
The former will have a much smaller confidence interval than the latter and isn’t the reality of this flow chart.
The chart wants to tell us from 1 million general populace how many of those are unvaxxed/vaxxed, and what proportion of them will be hospitalised. The conclusion was 86 single hospitalisation cases, of which 74 of them were from unvaxxed.
A positive sign that the vaccine has worthy benefits, but the sample size of 86 admissions is too small to make a definitive judgement.
Sorry mate do not agree at all.
get the vaccine, or you can’t do stuff
Totalitarianism by any other name. It doesn't make sense, as I said the viral load has been proven to be similar.
So again, what's the logic here? To prevent hospitals being overrun by the unvaxxed getting seriously ill? Unlikely, for two reasons:
1) the average age of the clubber is far below the average age of the seriously covid-ill.
2) the unvaxxed are in the minority now anyway, statistically-speaking the hospitals won't be as overrun as previous waves (if we assume the vaccines hold their promise to reduce hospitalisations).
Any other reasons why it makes sense to make the vaccines quasi-compulsory?