Deckard2049
Player Valuation: £15m
FDA and CDC don’t seem convinced.
You have to take into account the risk to the individual- in this case young children.Wouldn't vaccinating them also help to stop them spreading it?
So far the data I have seen from here in US is pretty encouraging re vaccination of teenagers.This is a good study. Its been obvious for quite a long time that kids seem to be able to fight it off. I don't really get the sudden urgancy from some people to vaccinate all kids. More research should be done on side effects first.
But as I understand it they haven't got the capacity because of a variety of factors.
There are three demands on NHS hospital beds currently -
One is scheduled surgeries including a huge backlog of cases that were delayed from the prior waves that quite possibly need more that usual hospital care as the patients condition is unlikely to have been improved by the delay.
The second is acute cases ie people that turn up to A&E which are for the second summer in a row unusually high
The third is COVID cases and those have a disproportionate impact on bed availability as you can't mix a ward with COVID cases and the first two categories - so if you have an 8 bed ward with 2 COVID cases you are down a further 6 beds that cannot be used.
All of this is also being done on a backdrop of an overworked and exhausted staff that desperately need to take their delayed vacation days otherwise there is an even higher risk of burnout.
So the only thing that can "give" is the scheduled surgeries.
I always figured the issue wasn’t with kids being at risk but that they’re super spreaders themselves to people more at risk.
Wouldn't vaccinating them also help to stop them spreading it?
Can't people still spread it with the vaccine though?
So, really the onus is still on getting all adults both doses, before switching focus to the little f*****.
We’ll have to disagree mate, the NHS seems to be struggling as it is and just can’t see how it will manage with a further increase in cases. Hopefully the gamble pays off but it just seems reckless from what I can see.Thanks legs.
Yep, it's a real mess.
But, i will counter that with, it's not going to get any better is it?
If we leave it now, we leave it until next spring, at the very, very earliest. Is that going to give the NHS chance to catch up, if you then throw in another peak - which could easily happen in the winter unless we're in full lockdown again?
It's all a gamble, that's my point. Of all the times to take a gamble, it's becoming now or never in terms of this year. And it really, really can't go on much longer.
Hope you manage to avoid it mate, congrats on the neice.Anyway, my housemate has tested positive but fortunately, well from my perspective, he was staying away over the weekend and I've had no contact since then.
Had to leg it back to my parents' (both fully dosed up for a good amount of time now and I'm just staying away from them, wearing a mask/gloves when we're in together) and gonna stay here for a week as my housemate is staying at ours so it seems daft risking further exposure when I've tested negative twice on lateral flows. Isolating in all but name just to be safe – I'm not gonna go the gym, was already working on Sunday so won't be going out for that, won't go to a shop etc. I'm gonna go out on my bike but on local routes or my runs because I have no symptoms. I know the lateral flows aren't fully reliable but unless I get symptoms, I have no need to PCR (and even those seem extremely inconsistent). If I get symptoms I'll get a test and isolate fully.
Absolutely gutting for me like, as I can't see my niece who was born on Tuesday, but better to be safe than sorry. But my housemate's contact was Saturday so I'm hoping that any risk of me testing positive would already have been and gone by now, so just gonna keep lateral flowing for the coming days.
Anyway, my housemate has tested positive but fortunately, well from my perspective, he was staying away over the weekend and I've had no contact since then.
Had to leg it back to my parents' (both fully dosed up for a good amount of time now and I'm just staying away from them, wearing a mask/gloves when we're in together) and gonna stay here for a week as my housemate is staying at ours so it seems daft risking further exposure when I've tested negative twice on lateral flows. Isolating in all but name just to be safe – I'm not gonna go the gym, was already working on Sunday so won't be going out for that, won't go to a shop etc. I'm gonna go out on my bike but on local routes or my runs because I have no symptoms. I know the lateral flows aren't fully reliable but unless I get symptoms, I have no need to PCR (and even those seem extremely inconsistent). If I get symptoms I'll get a test and isolate fully.
Absolutely gutting for me like, as I can't see my niece who was born on Tuesday, but better to be safe than sorry. But my housemate's contact was Saturday so I'm hoping that any risk of me testing positive would already have been and gone by now, so just gonna keep lateral flowing for the coming days.
Also probably a lower viral load if vaccinated and likely to be infectious for a shorter period of time.Less likely to have it = less likely to spread it?
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.