You better protect the vulnerable by getting to 60% - 70% immunity levels in a population. So called herd immunity levels. I dont know why you cant get that after 10 months of this. Vaccinate as many as that and the likelihood of the elderly and vulnerable coming into contact with those infected diminishes. Dont forget, these vaccines are not foolproof. In fact, we dont know how long or effective they will be.
What's the rush to go back to no restrictions beyond spring? Why cant we wait until later in the year to gear up the economy again? Didn't last year's rush back to 'normality' and the calamity it's brought teach you anything?
Well, actually, the 'rush to normality' last year didn't bring any calamity.
The cases through the summer stayed flat, even when accounting for a two-week delay.
What really didn't help was the unis going back, with schools too. Schools I understood, but unis there was no need for people to be travelling across the country.
That coincided with the weather changing, and a load of mixed messages in communications.
Well, in terms of the 'rush', I'd quite like to be able to do things again - we all would.
But, from something that doesn't directly impact me, entire industries will be gone. Look at the festival industry for one thing. It's knackered, completely knackered. People's livelihoods and businesses just gone, ruined. That's a social decision as much as an economic one.
Being able to go to a match - whether Premier League or lower league. Those teams and sports clubs need that injection of cash. The local cricket club my housemate plays for will go bust if they can't play this year and have people down. Again, that's a small, independent business at risk.
The summer, with better weather, and the vaccines getting out, shouldn't see a massive spike in cases.
If you're having to get a negative test to attend an event, or proof that you've had the vaccine, then why in the world shouldn't they be allowed to go on?