I agree there in relation to
@adi dassler and
@daza_1973's concerns.
But that doesn't really answer the point I raised does it?
If someone works on a salary, they get sick pay.
A lot of jobs that aren't salaried are in industries such as: hospitality (closed), leisure (closed), construction (open, but head offices should be shut/wfh), events (closed, lucky if we ever get them back), retail (closed), services (hairdressers and the like - closed)
I'm reeling off a few off the top of my head but all of those industries are either shut or all but shut. Support is there for most people (not all, and that's a travesty) and construction is the one keeping going.
If you're a contractor who needs to go to site, then yes, the worry is there that if you don't work, you don't get paid. Hopefully in that instance those people qualify for SEISS, and as I said with the site regulations that I know of, people are having to have tests before they go to site and to be able to prove they're negative. There definitely needs to be support in place though for that instance.
If you work in an office in any trade, then by and large you will be - or may never have stopped - working from home. In that instance, my point was you shouldn't have people phoning in sick because they have a cold or bug and are worried about spreading it. You're at home, so it's no concern. Obviously, if you're too ill to work that's a different matter.
But the industries which actually are really poor for people being off sick because if they are they don't get paid - and I'm sure you'd know this if you work in one, aren't you self-employed? - are by and large all now closed down, so it really shouldn't be an issue that people are worried that if they don't go
into a place of work, that they won't get paid.