Current Affairs Coronavirus Thread - Serious stuff !!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not sure there is much good evidence to state that as fact.

Very early into the course of the pandemic, there were reports about the level of restrictions that China had imposed, the speed by which they were addressing it as a public health crisis and effectively suspending any individual freedoms to do so.

Well no, they of course went strict fast, but being the epicentre of a pandemic and suddenly just having barely any deaths shown each day very early on it just looked remarkably "massaged" shall we say to me. We all know what they're like over there for censoring people over there.
 
I'm not aware of that. But I do seem to recall the debate shifting about China, right about the time that the USA and UK total infections and death rate started to surpass China's.
Yeah pure coincidence - the China virus and all that.

Quick blame them for our domestic incompetence
 
Still crazy how china managed to contain a brand new virus from out of nowhere to a single city , get rid of it without it travelling anywhere else, return to normal and make the first vaccine all within 10 months.

Very impressive how they have surpassed the rest of the world on creating a vaccine for it and for pandemic control given how many countries had it spread from top to bottom....

Sorry but it sounds like a conspiracy to say it came from a bat at this point. How on earth can china contain a virus to a single location that has crippled most countries it has entered?

The Chinese have played the West like a fiddle
 
Well no, they of course went strict fast, but being the epicentre of a pandemic and suddenly just having barely any deaths shown each day very early on it just looked remarkably "massaged" shall we say to me. We all know what they're like over there for censoring people over there.
Yes we do, which is why it's not particularly unremarkable that they imposed pretty draconian measures to limit the spread. Also, being the epicentre doesn't mean you will be any more greatly impacted.
 
Yes we do, which is why it's not particularly unremarkable that they imposed pretty draconian measures to limit the spread. Also, being the epicentre doesn't mean you will be any more greatly impacted.

Again, no stats (obviously) to back it up I just believe the figures coming out of China in March-May time were very undercooked. No prejudice there just personal opinion.

Like no other country in the world has a death graph like this lol

 
Sky in the mornings with kay burley is good for holding people to account and questioning their decisions.

5Live has consistently been the best place for information and debate in a non bias setting.

Avoid newspapers as they’re all coming from a place of bias in some way.
 
The Chinese have played the West like a fiddle

How quickly some people forget the early parts of this year. Because the virus is here now and this year is passing us by our focus now is simply on existing with the virus and holding on for a vaccine. Questions about its origins never seem to crop up anymore.


To the people who commend China’s handling of this virus, you do realise it goes hand in hand with the general authoritarian state of their society don’t you? I guess for some that is a society they would like to live in. Of course I’ve heard so often that isolating the vulnerable is impossible to do but it seems welding people into their homes is all part of an effective strategy. Instead of taking our sick to the hospitals and overwhelming them, surely this would be a better strategy? It would certainly help with the statistics anyway as you wouldn’t have to count them as real people.
 
Again, no stats (obviously) to back it up I just believe the figures coming out of China in March-May time were very undercooked. No prejudice there just personal opinion.
Almost universally the data by country was/is poor. China, by comparison to other countries, has a low rate per 100,000 but it's not unremarkably low and in comparison to it's neighbours it is comparably much worse. I'll caveat that by saying, as I've mentioned on here a number of times before, country by country comparison is apples and oranges because each country has its own methodology for response.

The data is similar when you look at deaths. Low against international comparison, but not unremarkably so and average against it's neighbours.

Again, I'm not sure data comparison in the way that is commonly reported is helpful because it looks at rate per entire population. If you consider that China effectively walled in Wuhan (urban population for Wuhan is around 8.5m/population 1.4b) it makes it even more unremarkable. If you consider the population density of other large cities (London 9m/65*m roughly 14%) and the flow in and out it's not unlikely that China hasn't seen a huge rate.

*Sorry @Kenshin I know I haven't counted everyone but I'm using doing the best I can.
 
Why is there over 1,400 Covid deaths on the NHS website where the person who died never tested positive?
But there death certificate has Covid-19?

'Deaths where a positive test result for COVID-19 was not received but COVID-19 is mentioned on their death certificate as also covered, but are reported separately'.
 
Almost universally the data by country was/is poor. China, by comparison to other countries, has a low rate per 100,000 but it's not unremarkably low and in comparison to it's neighbours it is comparably much worse. I'll caveat that by saying, as I've mentioned on here a number of times before, country by country comparison is apples and oranges because each country has its own methodology for response.

The data is similar when you look at deaths. Low against international comparison, but not unremarkably so and average against it's neighbours.

Again, I'm not sure data comparison in the way that is commonly reported is helpful because it looks at rate per entire population. If you consider that China effectively walled in Wuhan (urban population for Wuhan is around 8.5m/population 1.4b) it makes it even more unremarkable. If you consider the population density of other large cities (London 9m/65*m roughly 14%) and the flow in and out it's not unlikely that China hasn't seen a huge rate.

*Sorry @Kenshin I know I haven't counted everyone but I'm using doing the best I can.

I was referring more to the curve of the data not the actual figures themselves. Plateaued in April and hasn’t changed since... quite remarkable a place where this thing originated from to not seemingly have any ripple effects months down the line in deaths.
 
For a poster who bangs on about those following 'media buzzwords', being fed by the media and proclaiming to use 'literal' official information...that's a bit embarrassing.

What's embarrassing is trying to have a dig at a poster and failing.

Especially given out the two of us, I'm not the one repeating those buzzwords......
The BBC, The Guardian... literally anything.
What's the difference between sky news and the BBC news , honestly?

Or is it anywhere except the one I mentioned?

So sky lie about the news now? Have I missed something?
 
I was referring more to the curve of the data not the actual figures themselves. Plateaued in April and hasn’t changed since... quite remarkable a place where this thing originated from to not seemingly have any ripple effects months down the line in deaths.
There have been spikes, but they have an incredibly rigorous testing regime, quarantine rules and high adherence among the population to the public health measures.

There's some useful information here about control measures and how the surveillance is used to limit spread. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867420304864
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top