Correct. And that's the obvious proviso - not every situation is the same. There are differences in the success or failings in every country. The report does discuss the damage of lockdown and the damage of a continual cycle of lockdown has in countries. Interestingly, it suggests that where there is high instance of covid-19, less stringent measures have largely no effect because it's too prelevant in communities.
It seems to me, with some degree of expertise although I'm certainly no expert in the matter, that early intervention of lockdown to halt the virus; coupled with traditional public health measures have worked (hands, face, space, cost benefit analysis, measures appropriate to budget and culture, resource before restriction and a degree of codesign (or understanding of need) with public has been most successful.
I can sympathise to an extent, as while there have undoubtedly been mistakes made, it's also evident that across Europe, governments of hugely varying political standpoints and with varying approaches to the pandemic, have all suffered broadly similar outcomes. The Netherlands was another relatively open country, and I believe they're suffering the 3rd most infections in Europe at the moment. The obvious big country outlier is Germany, who have, and continue to do remarkably well.
I'm happy to be corrected, but I recall Witty saying at the start of this that there will be a cycle of restrictions-easing-restrictions pretty much until a vaccine is produced, which seems precisely what is happening.
