Current Affairs Coronavirus Thread - Serious stuff !!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
The flu vaccine is around 60% effective and has a generally poor uptake across the population.

In the defined categories this is the percentage uptake for 2019:
  • adults aged 65 or older: 72.0%
  • adults in at-risk groups: 48.0%
  • pregnant women: 45.2%
  • children aged 2: 43.8%
  • children aged 3: 45.9%
I guess that’s a breakdown of the percentage of people who’ve had the flu jab? So over half the population have had it and yet we still have 10,000 plus deaths per year.
If we had the same percentage vaccinated against COVID how many on average deaths would we have compared to the flu?
 
My issue is the world's governments have had all year now, and six months (most of those spent in lockdown to varying degrees in each country).

Each healthcare system in developed European nations should be able to handle it by now.

I reckon it may take slightly longer than that to recruit and train medical staff.
 
I reckon it may take slightly longer than that to recruit and train medical staff.

By spring it will have been a year.

That is more than enough time to come out of this without lockdown being the only solution.

That's what I'm talking about. I accept that to get us through this winter season we're gonna need restrictions. I still don't think that excuses them though.
 
I reckon it may take slightly longer than that to recruit and train medical staff.

I genuinely think that after a year of restrictions, they will start to cause more harm than good.

They said 3 weeks back in March and it's now been 6 months. We have to keep on top of things over the winter, but once we get to the spring, we have to move forward and allow people back to normal. People will be so weary of all this after the winter and will need a bit of hope.

I've said it before, but if the only solution our politicians have to this is to keep making restrictions tighter, then we need a new government.
 
By spring it will have been a year.

That is more than enough time to come out of this without lockdown being the only solution.

That's what I'm talking about. I accept that to get us through this winter season we're gonna need restrictions. I still don't think that excuses them though.

What are your ideas for controlling the spread of an aerosol virus without people remaining distanced from each other? Or you just let it rip?
 
I genuinely think that after a year of restrictions, they will start to cause more harm than good.

They said 3 weeks back in March and it's now been 6 months. We have to keep on top of things over the winter, but once we get to the spring, we have to move forward and allow people back to normal. People will be so weary of all this after the winter and will need a bit of hope.

I said on here a couple of days ago, I believe the winter is the time we have to get right. Corona is just a new one to add to the list of things that vulnerable people die from in winter and keeping capacity in health systems is the key to being able to shift towards normal come spring.

Or in other words, we've a record out in January and I want to be able to promote it.
 
I guess that’s a breakdown of the percentage of people who’ve had the flu jab? So over half the population have had it and yet we still have 10,000 plus deaths per year.
If we had the same percentage vaccinated against COVID how many on average deaths would we have compared to the flu?
Not even close.

That's the percentage of those who are listed in categories that get it free or advised to get it.

In 'at risk categories' it's largely around 40% uptake. As far as general population, much lower.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JLW
Just use your common sense when it comes to the rules.

I will be in a house with seven people at the weekend.

Of the people there three get tested on a regular basis through work, two people tested positive for the virus back in May, so the risk of infection is low.

My Mrs mum and dad are throwing a birthday party for me because I had to cancel all plans for my 30th due to a serious family emergency. Now, do I say cancel it because more than six people will be there, or do we evaluate the risks to ourselves and say it’s ok to go ahead?

Public transport is another one. You’re only supposed to be using it for essential reason but if you have your mask, sanitise your hands and travel when it’s quiet then you’re massively limiting your risk of contracting the virus.

Obviously follow the rules as much as possible but if you have to break them use your common sense.
 
Just use your common sense when it comes to the rules.

I will be in a house with seven people at the weekend.

Of the people there three get tested on a regular basis through work, two people tested positive for the virus back in May, so the risk of infection is low.

My Mrs mum and dad are throwing a birthday party for me because I had to cancel all plans for my 30th due to a serious family emergency. Now, do I say cancel it because more than six people will be there, or do we evaluate the risks to ourselves and say it’s ok to go ahead?

Public transport is another one. You’re only supposed to be using it for essential reason but if you have your mask, sanitise your hands and travel when it’s quiet then you’re massively limiting your risk of contracting the virus.

Obviously follow the rules as much as possible but if you have to break them use your common sense.
Best post in thread
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top