and what would generally in the research community be considered a persuavive sample size?And to define thesis
To be proved.
So where you going with this?
and what would generally in the research community be considered a persuavive sample size?And to define thesis
To be proved.
So where you going with this?
and what would generally in the research community be considered a persuavive sample size?
Waitand what would generally in the research community be considered a persuavive sample size?
I asked a question, I did not ask for 50 stupid questions in return so you can avoid your poorly constructed arguments, which I realise is your style.Wait
So you are glossing over the defenition of the terms you asked for?
The part saying to be proved? As In not proven?
Meaning not fact but a theory , as in thesis?
So again, where are you going with this? As you are off down a path that by defenition says not proven , if you are making a point that is a very shaky ground.
We keep a supply in the car and if we ever need them I just pop back to the car to get them. We went on the King Harry Ferry yesterday (a chain pulled car ferry cross the Fal River, same as the one on Lake Windermere) It's technically public transport so if we got out of the car you needed to put one on. Pedestrians and cyclists all have to wear one. Everybody just accepts it down here as part of current life.My issue is simply remembering to have it on me haha. I've got 3 now, 1 in my car, 1 in my coat and 1 in the house I try take with me.
No, you are trying to make a point based on defenition theory .I asked a question, I did not ask for 50 stupid questions in return so you can avoid your poorly constructed arguments, which I realise is your style.
Don’t know, sorry.
But even if you ignore the safety aspect as I understand it another purpose of Phase 3 is to test for efficacy - ie whether it makes much difference compared to standard care. So it takes a while to be able to get the results that having the vaccine means you don’t develop the virus from regular day activities. You can speed this up by doing “challenge trials” but there are quite a lot of ethical issues with those.
![]()
Human challenge trials with live coronavirus aren't the answer to a Covid-19 vaccine
Trying to accelerate the development of a Covid-19 vaccine should not mean forsaking ethical concerns, putting well-intentioned volunteers at needless risk, or setting back global vaccine efforts.www.statnews.com
From what I last read I think they are still looking for Phase 3 volunteers if you are interested.
Why taking part matters - Be Part of Research
Discover why taking part in research with Be Part of Research matters, how your participation helps the NHS and the personal benefits of taking part.bepartofresearch.nihr.ac.uk

We keep a supply in the car and if we ever need them I just pop back to the car to get them. We went on the King Harry Ferry yesterday (a chain pulled car ferry cross the Fal River, same as the one on Lake Windermere) It's technically public transport so if we got out of the car you needed to put one on. Pedestrians and cyclists all have to wear one. Everybody just accepts it down here as part of current life.
This is the second time I've tried reasoning with your nonsense and I should apologise as that's my mistake for not learning my lesson after you got confused about the differences between a shop and an aircraft. But, clearly you will never actually respond to any critique and just aimlessly scattergun stupid questions in instead, so as I'm of the opinion an infinite number of monkeys are working your laptop I will have to bid you good day and pop you on ignore. I'm sure the fake roid heads will still read your ignorant and dangerous lies/drivelNo, you are trying to make a point based on defenition theory .
You can act like a tit all you want but given you wanted a defenition of a scientific equivalent of a guess, it's not really going anywhere is it?
You want to say oh but if they have X amount of people in a case study then how can you argue against it, aren't you?
Starting with the term thesis though isn't a good way to go about making that point is it?
Yeh not seen anyone in shops here so far not wearing one, aside some staff, but they're all behind screens so maybe that's why.
The funny thing is mate.This is the second time I've tried reasoning with your nonsense and I should apologise as that's my mistake for not learning my lesson after you got confused about the differences between a shop and an aircraft. But, clearly you will never actually respond to any critique and just aimlessly scattergun stupid questions in instead, so as I'm of the opinion an infinite number of monkeys are working your laptop I will have to bid you good day and pop you on ignore. I'm sure the fake roid heads will still read your ignorant and dangerous lies/drivel
How long does phase 3 have to last for though?
Surely long term effects could start months even years after vaccination - whats the cut off point thats deemed acceptable?
For me the economy simply couldn't take another lockdown - its either ride it out from this point or a shortened phase 3 and take the risk as it were
Our staff have been advised to wear them, even if behind the screens, just to save the arguments of ‘well your not wearing one’, even though they don’t have to behind the screens.Yeh not seen anyone in shops here so far not wearing one, aside some staff, but they're all behind screens so maybe that's why.
Also there's a big difference between wearing one for half an hour or so, and wearing one for a full shift.Yeh not seen anyone in shops here so far not wearing one, aside some staff, but they're all behind screens so maybe that's why.
Same here. Supermarkets, corner shops, garages, everyone has one on. They are not a problem, other than steaming your specs up for a few seconds, and they help protect us all.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.