Current Affairs Coronavirus Thread - Serious stuff !!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
and what would generally in the research community be considered a persuavive sample size?
Wait

So you are glossing over the defenition of the terms you asked for?

The part saying to be proved? As In not proven?

Meaning not fact but a theory , as in thesis?

So again, where are you going with this? As you are off down a path that by defenition says not proven , if you are making a point that is a very shaky ground.
 
Wait

So you are glossing over the defenition of the terms you asked for?

The part saying to be proved? As In not proven?

Meaning not fact but a theory , as in thesis?

So again, where are you going with this? As you are off down a path that by defenition says not proven , if you are making a point that is a very shaky ground.
I asked a question, I did not ask for 50 stupid questions in return so you can avoid your poorly constructed arguments, which I realise is your style.
 
My issue is simply remembering to have it on me haha. I've got 3 now, 1 in my car, 1 in my coat and 1 in the house I try take with me.
We keep a supply in the car and if we ever need them I just pop back to the car to get them. We went on the King Harry Ferry yesterday (a chain pulled car ferry cross the Fal River, same as the one on Lake Windermere) It's technically public transport so if we got out of the car you needed to put one on. Pedestrians and cyclists all have to wear one. Everybody just accepts it down here as part of current life.
 
I asked a question, I did not ask for 50 stupid questions in return so you can avoid your poorly constructed arguments, which I realise is your style.
No, you are trying to make a point based on defenition theory .

You can act like a tit all you want but given you wanted a defenition of a scientific equivalent of a guess, it's not really going anywhere is it?

You want to say oh but if they have X amount of people in a case study then how can you argue against it, aren't you?

Starting with the term thesis though isn't a good way to go about making that point is it?

Case study = theory.

Theory = not proven

Not proven = open for discussion.

Or do you disagree with that as well just because I posted it?
 
Don’t know, sorry.

But even if you ignore the safety aspect as I understand it another purpose of Phase 3 is to test for efficacy - ie whether it makes much difference compared to standard care. So it takes a while to be able to get the results that having the vaccine means you don’t develop the virus from regular day activities. You can speed this up by doing “challenge trials” but there are quite a lot of ethical issues with those.

From what I last read I think they are still looking for Phase 3 volunteers if you are interested.

They dont even pay you for it? Pfft I aint taking the risk of growing a third nipple for nothing :oops:
 
We keep a supply in the car and if we ever need them I just pop back to the car to get them. We went on the King Harry Ferry yesterday (a chain pulled car ferry cross the Fal River, same as the one on Lake Windermere) It's technically public transport so if we got out of the car you needed to put one on. Pedestrians and cyclists all have to wear one. Everybody just accepts it down here as part of current life.

Yeh not seen anyone in shops here so far not wearing one, aside some staff, but they're all behind screens so maybe that's why.
 
No, you are trying to make a point based on defenition theory .

You can act like a tit all you want but given you wanted a defenition of a scientific equivalent of a guess, it's not really going anywhere is it?

You want to say oh but if they have X amount of people in a case study then how can you argue against it, aren't you?

Starting with the term thesis though isn't a good way to go about making that point is it?
This is the second time I've tried reasoning with your nonsense and I should apologise as that's my mistake for not learning my lesson after you got confused about the differences between a shop and an aircraft. But, clearly you will never actually respond to any critique and just aimlessly scattergun stupid questions in instead, so as I'm of the opinion an infinite number of monkeys are working your laptop I will have to bid you good day and pop you on ignore. I'm sure the fake roid heads will still read your ignorant and dangerous lies/drivel
 
This is the second time I've tried reasoning with your nonsense and I should apologise as that's my mistake for not learning my lesson after you got confused about the differences between a shop and an aircraft. But, clearly you will never actually respond to any critique and just aimlessly scattergun stupid questions in instead, so as I'm of the opinion an infinite number of monkeys are working your laptop I will have to bid you good day and pop you on ignore. I'm sure the fake roid heads will still read your ignorant and dangerous lies/drivel
The funny thing is mate.

All I said was that I went into some shops in town and the staff weren't wearing masks.

Look where it's ended up by you turning it into something completely different

Seems you have the issue not me.
 
How long does phase 3 have to last for though?

Surely long term effects could start months even years after vaccination - whats the cut off point thats deemed acceptable?

For me the economy simply couldn't take another lockdown - its either ride it out from this point or a shortened phase 3 and take the risk as it were

Realistically, even given the urgency of getting a COVID vaccine to market, I'd say you're talking a minimum of six to nine months from starting Phase III to getting approval. That puts us, best realistic case, in the Jan to April 2021 range.

Getting vaccines into the general public this year with an acceptable level of risk is just about possible, but I'd guess it's less than a 1 in 10 shout.

Once a vaccine's approved and in use, it'll probably enter Phase IV, which is basically a monitoring period after it goes into general use.
 
Yeh not seen anyone in shops here so far not wearing one, aside some staff, but they're all behind screens so maybe that's why.
Our staff have been advised to wear them, even if behind the screens, just to save the arguments of ‘well your not wearing one’, even though they don’t have to behind the screens.
Anyone with asthma etc doesn’t have to wear one obviously.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top