So maybe that's what the government have done then? If the virus is hitting the Asian communities because they are having big home gatherings, then the governments measures of keeping pubs open but restricting home gatherings make sense don't they?
As I say I can't comment on that front because I really don't have a clue other than discussion in here for example. If the theory is closer to home that these communities didn't follow strict guidelines in the first place then it won't make any difference anyway. But then I have no first hand knowledge of that and saw nothing in Liverpool suggesting that.
I'm more focused on the business aspect, that seems to be ignored now. Flare ups in business yet communities suffer? A city in lockdown because of a factory , other reported cases of factories and centres having cases for example shouldn't be ignored. Except it seems to be the case , people want to blame communities , visits to family etc rather than what is literally happening.
As it seems to be established now, you can work without measures in place , protest, celebrate a title win (media source determined) go the pub , go to big supermarkets etc but at some point we will all be told to stay away from family.
To me it doesn't make sense, especially given the fact there is evidence that is fact that flare ups are happening at pubs / factories etc rather than through people visiting each other (unless you follow the Asian thought process ).