What they said at the outset was that there will be a number of peaks and troughs and that lockdowns would need to be applied again and again.One thing regarding the "is it all over" angle, Witty et al were quite clear at the outset of this that any lockdowns have a shelf life, and this shelf life isn't really due to the virus being defeated so much as people having a limit to what they can mentally and financially take. This release of the lockdown seems as much a case of letting people let off some steam while also testing how effective mitigation measures are when the economy is re-opened a bit.
One thing regarding the "is it all over" angle, Witty et al were quite clear at the outset of this that any lockdowns have a shelf life, and this shelf life isn't really due to the virus being defeated so much as people having a limit to what they can mentally and financially take. This release of the lockdown seems as much a case of letting people let off some steam while also testing how effective mitigation measures are when the economy is re-opened a bit.
“Major incident” declared in Bournemouth whatever that means, presumably too many people on the beach ?
Sucks to be the police having to tell thousands of people to jog on
What they said at the outset was that there will be a number of peaks and troughs and that lockdowns would need to be applied again and again.
Who is paying you to say this ?
![]()
Bournemouth beach: 'Major incident' as thousands flock to coast
A major incident is declared in Bournemouth as thousands hit the coast in soaring heat.www.bbc.co.uk
This is the crux of dealing with the new post-lockdown world.
Government and local authorities cannot on the one hand urge people to stay away and then declare an emergency when people not unsurprisingly test the limits to the hilt and act on individual will.
If there is still a public health emergency, there can't be room for grey areas and the state should continue to lead the response. That doesn't mean letting people as individuals off the hook, on the contrary, but expecting them to act en masse in a co-ordinated fashion and for the common good simply displays nothing other than ignorance of human nature. Most particularly in a situation like this one where what is unfolding today will come as no surprise to anyone.
That's why the deliberate shift in emphasis towards personal responsibility is wrong and potentially very dangerous. I'm not a statist, but you cannot manage a crisis of this nature by anything other than a strong, consistent, and coherent national response. Only then are the wekest and most vulnerable protected.
Yes, it has. There will be no more national lockdowns.Not sure that's changed, has it?
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.