Current Affairs Coronavirus Thread - Serious stuff !!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Reading a paper about the effectiveness of the South Korean response this morning. They send a text message to people whenever someone in their neighbourhood is confirmed as a carrier, with details of their movements captured using phone and credit card data. Perhaps importantly, however, they're only able to do this because a law was introduced after the MERS outbreak in 2015 that allows the Korean disease control centre access to such data. Fairly sure no such law exists here (or in any western country), and I'd imagine it would be practically impossible to introduce in any kind of practical timeframe.
 
Reading a paper about the effectiveness of the South Korean response this morning. They send a text message to people whenever someone in their neighbourhood is confirmed as a carrier, with details of their movements captured using phone and credit card data. Perhaps importantly, however, they're only able to do this because a law was introduced after the MERS outbreak in 2015 that allows the Korean disease control centre access to such data. Fairly sure no such law exists here (or in any western country), and I'd imagine it would be practically impossible to introduce in any kind of practical timeframe.
We’ve already been text by our data provider on the issue. So presumably some kind of law exists?
 
"Not only can Mary Wakefield, Dominic Cummings’ wife, drive, but in 2012 she won a Spectator travel essay competition - judged by Boris Johnson - in which she wrote: "I drove for an hour every morning, slaloming past the road-rage wrecks of battered trucks up the 135 from Dallas to Denton”. So clearly she could handle the A1 at a time when road traffic was at historic low.
She also recovered long before Cummings did - according to both their accounts - so why didn’t she just drive, instead of taking this eyesight-test-drive to a picturesque market town with the whole family in the car?
And why didn’t ANY of what Cummings said, make it into either his or Wakefield’s articles on their lockdown experience, if they didn’t know the trip was wrong, and best kept quiet?
There are SO many holes in this story it’s sinking faster than Chris Grayling’s imaginary ferries!

If his sight was failing, and he needed to get back to London, why didn't his wife drive?
First thing I do is when I believe my sight is failing me, is get the family and pile them in the car and I drive them. They love being daddy's little crash test dummies... Also, pretty sure if he we're needed so badly by Downing Street it would have sent transport to retrieve him.
 
First thing I do is when I believe my sight is failing me, is get the family and pile them in the car and I drive them. They love being daddy's little crash test dummies... Also, pretty sure if he we're needed so badly by Downing Street it would have sent transport to retrieve him.

Its how BA test their pilots eye sight. Let them have a spin in a Boeing, safely landed, jobs a good'un.
 
First thing I do is when I believe my sight is failing me, is get the family and pile them in the car and I drive them. They love being daddy's little crash test dummies... Also, pretty sure if he we're needed so badly by Downing Street it would have sent transport to retrieve him.

Cummings, Johnson, the Durham police and others planned and plotted yesterday to 'Oh! What A Tangled Web We Weave When First We Practice To Deceive'. to save Cummings/Johnson's bacon Unfortunately for them, there's more holes in the Cummings/Johnson narrative than a Swiss cheese and smell a rat.
 
As for the story itself, it was incredibly bizarre, like the plot of some kind of straight-to-DVD midmarket American comedy. After attacking the media for telling lies, he proceeded to accept the two main stories they had uncovered about him - firstly that he had driven to Durham and secondly that he had then gone to Barnard Castle. His excuse for the latter journey was that he was unsure if his eyesight was working, so to test it out he took a half hour trip to a beauty spot with his wife and child in the car.

It's hard to know what to do with this. Let's say it's false, which you kind of have to hope it is. In that case he should resign for lying and breaking the rules which he himself set, as well as damaging public acceptance of the lock-down. He should also resign on the more superficial, but arguably more pertinent, basis that, as a political adviser, he does not understand that this story is inadequate to stop the coverage.

But what if he isn't? What if this is a thing he actually did? Then surely it is also the case that he should resign, on the basis that his judgment is hopelessly impaired. Testing your capacity to drive by driving is not a sensible thing to do. If you are going to do it, it is even less sensible to take a half hour drive instead of just going around the block. And if this really is something you insist on doing regardless, then do not put your child in the car, especially if their safety is ostensibly the reason you went to Durham in the first place.

In the end though, the real story today wasn't his strange timeline. That, by the end of the press conference, was more of a comedy subplot than anything else. The real story was the state of him. He was stripped of all the culture war defences he had built up over the last few years - weaponising the right-wing press over Brexit and firing off constant salvos of 'will of the people' gibberish. So what we saw was a slight and helpless figure. Once the lights were turned in on him, it was clear he wasn't up to it. Boris Johnson has staked his reputation on this man. He put his government on the line and risked his public health strategy in order to preserve him. Given the performance today, it's hard to work out why.
'its a shame so many inaccuracies and fake news has been written about me'

Maybe start with your wife
 

But the WHO is in the pocket of Bill Gates and I bet they're not even trying it with zinc!

Not my opinion, the opinion of the proponents of HCQ that won't hear anything bad said against it. Every study I've ever seen them link to is the very definition of bad science, they wouldn't recognise a randomised double-blind study if it slapped them in the face.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top