Current Affairs Coronavirus Thread - Serious stuff !!!

[roydo]

busy roy.

FF absolutely S

 

[Aqui1a]

I'm on your side mate, pls stop being so defensive. Look, there's no time for this. I'm going to take your posts with the BBC article and your Google searches and assemble the leaders of the G7. I'll let you keep posting, but there's honestly no need. If the sheeple can't see the truth from the robust case you have put in front of them, I'm afraid they sadly never will. Best of luck my fellow man of truth x

 

[davek]

I think comparing medical professionals in the UK on 21st April 2020 to Joseph Mengele (sic) is pathetic, and way beneath you.

But carry on being said tool.

I think 'being a tool' here is taking the opposite political view to you.

BTW, is it now policy for you to endorse the abuse of other posters and join in on a pile on?

 

[tsubaki]

Well it could be worse. We could have a Labour Government who are so obsessed with their civil war that Coronavirus would be well down their 'to do' list. Though stats would be promising with Diane Abbott in charge. lol

why would there be a civil war in Labour if they had won the last election?

 

[PhilM]

While I do think Cheltenham was a terrible idea (even before hindsight), I instantly consider here whether it is perhaps a case of correlation rather than causation.

Cheltenham attracts people from all over the country and the world (mass Irish attendance), so you'd wonder what % of the attendees actually are from those trusts.

Would the local attendees warrant a 100%+ increase? I'm not saying it hasn't played a part (I suspect it has), but how much is the question.

 

[Aqui1a]

Ok, I have no idea who this anonymous person is (clearly this forum takes privacy very seriously) but whoever it is, knock it off! lol lol lol

 

[tsubaki]

I am absolutely convinced sommet was here before all this. Just too many posters have reported similar.

Might not be this CV, but deffo some weird thing.

There was the opportunity for it to be here before the first case was discovered, though not in November.

 

[roydo]

I think 'being a tool' here is taking the opposite political view to you.

BTW, is it now policy for you to endorse the abuse of other posters and join in on a pile on?
[/QUOTE

Not in the slightest mate. I think you will see that over the years I have admired your stances, if not agreeing with them.

You have a certain posting style that can be very very funny, (Moyes/bayonetes/babies) was a particular fave. It can also be, at times, daft.

Comparing senior UK medical professionals to a Nazi "Doctor" is not your finest moment.

 

[LinekersLegs]

While I do think Cheltenham was a terrible idea (even before hindsight), I instantly consider here whether it is perhaps a case of correlation rather than causation.

Cheltenham attracts people from all over the country and the world (mass Irish attendance), so you'd wonder what % of the attendees actually are from those trusts.

Would the local attendees warrant a 100%+ increase? I'm not saying it hasn't played a part (I suspect it has), but how much is the question.

Care to join a “correlation does not imply causation” club? I’ll serve pizza!

 

[paultheblue]

While I do think Cheltenham was a terrible idea (even before hindsight), I instantly consider here whether it is perhaps a case of correlation rather than causation.

Cheltenham attracts people from all over the country and the world (mass Irish attendance), so you'd wonder what % of the attendees actually are from those trusts.

Would the local attendees warrant a 100%+ increase? I'm not saying it hasn't played a part (I suspect it has), but how much is the question.

The people working in bars , hotels and restaurants would all be local

 

[roydo]

The people working in bars , hotels and restaurants would all be local

Semantic city.

Nah. Massive load of imported agency and if you like, circus workers. (As in they work for a catering/bookie/security mob that follow the racing and hospitality market round the country)

Not great anyrate.

 

[tsubaki]

The people working in bars , hotels and restaurants would all be local

Indeed, and they'd have been in contact with a lot more people than random racegoers would have. That might also explain why bus drivers and medical personnel seem to be much more hit by this than tube workers, cops and firefighters.

 

[PhilM]

The people working in bars , hotels and restaurants would all be local

They would, but would that alone warrant the 100%+ increase was my point e.g. has Liverpool seen a similar increase with the Atleti fans travelling to the city?

Like I said, I suspect it has played a part, but I do wonder if it's another example of simply picking the easy links rather than investigating it in the required detail.

 

[Jebus_lives]

No, I asked you what LinekerLegs meant by other motives, which they explicity said. If you claim it to be measured, what does that mean?

Maybe you can tell us yourself, @LinekersLegs?

Political motivation. Although in the context of the post, I expect someone who wanted to push a racist agenda could make the case for an engineered virus. It seems a pretty weak example to suggest 'You can't even speculate that the virus was created in a lab because of how people seem to think the people who claim it are racist or xenophobic or something'.

However, I'm sure @LinekersLegs can speak for themselves.

 

[tsubaki]

They would, but would that alone warrant the 100%+ increase was my point e.g. has Liverpool seen a similar increase with the Atleti fans travelling to the city?

Like I said, I suspect it has played a part, but I do wonder if it's another example of simply picking the easy links rather than investigating it in the required detail.

Not that there is the people to do this now, but it would be interesting to do a study of the people who the Atleti fans came into contact with (hotel workers, designated pubs staff, people who work in the Anfield Road end of the tin mine etc) and see whether there was a higher rate of infection than a control group.