Current Affairs Climate Change

Status
Not open for further replies.
Have to laugh when climate fundamentalists, media and political wallahs get off on some extreme weather event saying it's "climate change" and the general public collectively shrug their shoulders saying "yeh, the climate always changes, wtf" and cult climate doom kicks right off

If they just told the truth and said the cause is "MAN MADE climate change" people wouldn't shrug their shoulders they would just ask "how do you know?"

Imagine the sniggering when the words "computer models show ..." pop out. lol
 
Have to laugh when climate fundamentalists, media and political wallahs get off on some extreme weather event saying it's "climate change" and the general public collectively shrug their shoulders saying "yeh, the climate always changes, wtf" and cult climate doom kicks right off

If they just told the truth and said the cause is "MAN MADE climate change" people wouldn't shrug their shoulders they would just ask "how do you know?"

Imagine the sniggering when the words "computer models show ..." pop out. lol
You have taken several hidings on this already baz, you sure you want to take more of a beating?
 
Have to laugh when climate fundamentalists, media and political wallahs get off on some extreme weather event saying it's "climate change" and the general public collectively shrug their shoulders saying "yeh, the climate always changes, wtf" and cult climate doom kicks right off

If they just told the truth and said the cause is "MAN MADE climate change" people wouldn't shrug their shoulders they would just ask "how do you know?"

Imagine the sniggering when the words "computer models show ..." pop out. lol
Out of interest, what conclusive proof do you have, which is stronger than computer modelling, that it's not real?
 
Out of interest, what conclusive proof do you have, which is stronger than computer modelling, that it's not real?
Easy.

Extreme weather events have always happened ditto temp and sea level rise this is the proven status quo of natural occurrences, in scientific terms it is the null hypothesis. Observational evidence to disprove the null has not happened therefore the null stands as the only robust explanation under current understanding

If climate models had predicted something unique like hail stones changing shape to fall in the shape of small yellow hedgehogs and it actually happened then there's something to go at but trouser fondling over bush fires in "fire season", flooding in the "rainy season" etc is simply a cult perversion. Even proponents of man made climate change, the IPCC, concede "the long term prediction of long term climate states is not possible" dismantling the entire raison d'etre of climate models in a trice.

My fave perspective on climate models was given by Dr David Frame, Climate modeler, Oxford University


“The models are convenient fictions that provide something very useful.”
 
Easy.

Extreme weather events have always happened ditto temp and sea level rise this is the proven status quo of natural occurrences, in scientific terms it is the null hypothesis. Observational evidence to disprove the null has not happened therefore the null stands as the only robust explanation under current understanding

If climate models had predicted something unique like hail stones changing shape to fall in the shape of small yellow hedgehogs and it actually happened then there's something to go at but trouser fondling over bush fires in "fire season", flooding in the "rainy season" etc is simply a cult perversion. Even proponents of man made climate change, the IPCC, concede "the long term prediction of long term climate states is not possible" dismantling the entire raison d'etre of climate models in a trice.

My fave perspective on climate models was given by Dr David Frame, Climate modeler, Oxford University


“The models are convenient fictions that provide something very useful.”

Thanks Barry. Steak and ale pie with a pint of Bass for tea?
 
Easy.

Extreme weather events have always happened ditto temp and sea level rise this is the proven status quo of natural occurrences, in scientific terms it is the null hypothesis. Observational evidence to disprove the null has not happened therefore the null stands as the only robust explanation under current understanding

If climate models had predicted something unique like hail stones changing shape to fall in the shape of small yellow hedgehogs and it actually happened then there's something to go at but trouser fondling over bush fires in "fire season", flooding in the "rainy season" etc is simply a cult perversion. Even proponents of man made climate change, the IPCC, concede "the long term prediction of long term climate states is not possible" dismantling the entire raison d'etre of climate models in a trice.

My fave perspective on climate models was given by Dr David Frame, Climate modeler, Oxford University


“The models are convenient fictions that provide something very useful.”
I was starting to think you might actually be putting some proof together, but instead you chose to just say we have had bad weather before.

I must congratulate you though, it has taken me a while to realise you are actually just playing a parody of climate change deniers. You had me going for a while, but you took it a bit too far with that post and blew your cover ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top