GwladysPhil
Player Valuation: £35m
Pretty sure I was sitting in a beer garden in shorts last February,
So yeah lmao the planet is dying,
So yeah lmao the planet is dying,
You have taken several hidings on this already baz, you sure you want to take more of a beating?Have to laugh when climate fundamentalists, media and political wallahs get off on some extreme weather event saying it's "climate change" and the general public collectively shrug their shoulders saying "yeh, the climate always changes, wtf" and cult climate doom kicks right off
If they just told the truth and said the cause is "MAN MADE climate change" people wouldn't shrug their shoulders they would just ask "how do you know?"
Imagine the sniggering when the words "computer models show ..." pop out. lol
Oh so he's not joking?You have taken several hidings on this already baz, you sure you want to take more of a beating?
No mate. He’s legit bananasOh so he's not joking?
Out of interest, what conclusive proof do you have, which is stronger than computer modelling, that it's not real?Have to laugh when climate fundamentalists, media and political wallahs get off on some extreme weather event saying it's "climate change" and the general public collectively shrug their shoulders saying "yeh, the climate always changes, wtf" and cult climate doom kicks right off
If they just told the truth and said the cause is "MAN MADE climate change" people wouldn't shrug their shoulders they would just ask "how do you know?"
Imagine the sniggering when the words "computer models show ..." pop out. lol
You are going down the rabbit hole of ignorance and fallacious reasoning, peppered with selective responses, tendentious sound-bytes, and cherry-picked examples. You’ve been warned.Out of interest, what conclusive proof do you have, which is stronger than computer modelling, that it's not real?
Easy.Out of interest, what conclusive proof do you have, which is stronger than computer modelling, that it's not real?
Climate Change Deniers Vs Flat Earthers
Who is stupider?
Answers on a postcard
Easy.
Extreme weather events have always happened ditto temp and sea level rise this is the proven status quo of natural occurrences, in scientific terms it is the null hypothesis. Observational evidence to disprove the null has not happened therefore the null stands as the only robust explanation under current understanding
If climate models had predicted something unique like hail stones changing shape to fall in the shape of small yellow hedgehogs and it actually happened then there's something to go at but trouser fondling over bush fires in "fire season", flooding in the "rainy season" etc is simply a cult perversion. Even proponents of man made climate change, the IPCC, concede "the long term prediction of long term climate states is not possible" dismantling the entire raison d'etre of climate models in a trice.
My fave perspective on climate models was given by Dr David Frame, Climate modeler, Oxford University
“The models are convenient fictions that provide something very useful.”
Beans on toast tonight, you having yellow hedgehog soup perchance?Thanks Barry. Steak and ale pie with a pint of Bass for tea?
Beans on toast tonight, you having yellow hedgehog soup perchance?
I was starting to think you might actually be putting some proof together, but instead you chose to just say we have had bad weather before.Easy.
Extreme weather events have always happened ditto temp and sea level rise this is the proven status quo of natural occurrences, in scientific terms it is the null hypothesis. Observational evidence to disprove the null has not happened therefore the null stands as the only robust explanation under current understanding
If climate models had predicted something unique like hail stones changing shape to fall in the shape of small yellow hedgehogs and it actually happened then there's something to go at but trouser fondling over bush fires in "fire season", flooding in the "rainy season" etc is simply a cult perversion. Even proponents of man made climate change, the IPCC, concede "the long term prediction of long term climate states is not possible" dismantling the entire raison d'etre of climate models in a trice.
My fave perspective on climate models was given by Dr David Frame, Climate modeler, Oxford University
“The models are convenient fictions that provide something very useful.”
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.