"Better kids are politicised in a good way rather than lost on an X-Box."
Yeah, this is going to be a balanced debate...'kin hell.
Yeah, this is going to be a balanced debate...'kin hell.
Who’s using her? Big clean energy, big refugee rights, big disaster response.
Look at her ted talk from last year, it’s exactly the same.
If you’re wondering about being used, ask yourself why you’re still driving a petrol car.
Used really?
She’s being used as an emotional lever by a PR company that represents Green Energy companies. Everything is being designed by someone to shame and guilt.
So it’s just a series of coincidences that the PR companies are the same? Sure.Used really?
Maybe she shares the message the Green Energy companies stand for have you considered that?
Not all 16 year old are naive and well teenagers mentally.
The PR company maybe helping her and those companies get their message out because well that's what PR companies do.
She is only being used if she is being spoon fed and not truly thinking for herself you and do not know that. Without you or anyone else disparaging her actually knowing her personally and knowing what's going on in her head its unfair to say she cannot think for herself and thus is being used.
She seems to believe what she is talking about. Off course some of what she says overlaps with Green Energy advocates because its what she wants. Less destruction more green energy and conservation.
She’s being used as an emotional lever by a PR company that represents Green Energy companies. Everything is being designed by someone to shame and guilt.
People are weird and make their conclusions based on irrelevant factors. Her age seems to be a big offense to a lot of peoples opinion on her credibility. She doesnt know what shes talking about because shes only 16. Wonder how many of those people have read the Granton report or look at the data coming out of climate analytics? Like she keeps saying, she doesnt want people to listen to her just to listen to the subject matter experts and wake th f up.It is pretty depressing but all too human to see people determining whether the overwhelming scientific consensus on climate change is a) true and b) worth doing something about based on whether or not they get negative vibes from a sixteen year girl, as if that is even remotely relevant to the atmospheric carbon ppm rate.
I never said that.So it’s just a series of coincidences that the PR companies are the same? Sure.
The ‘Greta effect’ is nothing more than a co-ordinated hustle to get more money pumped into the ‘green’ economy. She most likely completely believes what she says and honestly more power to her - but it’s becoming more and more obvious that this image is being manufactured.
Let's have none of that "commie" stuff thank you.I’d rather live in a world run by the “not for profit complex’ than the very much for profit ‘military Industrial complex’
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.