Ban All Dangerous Dogs

[carlos21]

Whilst I see the point you are making, not a chance I should have to pay to have my two dogs, they cost enough to look after already.

good point andy.

 

[peteblue]

what dogs have you all go.

Golden Retriever mate, boss dog.......

 

[carlos21]

Golden Retriever mate, boss dog.......

springer spaniel.

 

[peteblue]

springer spaniel.

Another boss dog......

 

[carlos21]

Another boss dog......

bull mastiff.

 

[Blue 1]

what dogs have you all go.

Haven't got one mate, would like a flat haired Jack Russell though. They're funny as f***.

 

[carlos21]

Haven't got one mate, would like a flat haired Jack Russell though. They're funny as f***.

cool kid.

 

[Steve0]

Do you have any dogs, carlos?

 

[carlos21]

Do you have any dogs, carlos?

springer spaniel and staffy.

 

[kev101]

Dog Licensing again would sort it all out.....

Decent owners would get a licence, scallies wouldn't! And nobody would be able/bother to do anything about it.

 

[monty]

Decent owners would get a licence, scallies wouldn't! And nobody would be able/bother to do anything about it.

They used to have annual dog licenses but no one ever checked them, they don't work as they were unenforceable. What would work is a one off charge for all dogs to be micro chipped in a way that the owner could be identified. That would also help to deter lazy owners would do clean up mess left by their dogs

 

[carlos21]

They used to have annual dog licenses but no one ever checked them, they don't work as they were unenforceable. What would work is a one off charge for all dogs to be micro chipped in a way that the owner could be identified. That would also help to deter lazy owners would do clean up mess left by their dogs

very good point the Monty.

 

[scratchnsurf]

All dogs should be microchipped. The process of buying or changing details on a microchip should include an identity check so that previously irresponsible owners are prevented from owning dogs. Anyone wishing to breed dogs should have to be licensed. The cost of the microchipping and licensing should be sufficient to cover the cost of enforcing the compulsory aspect of both.

You cannot judge dogs by appearance or breed alone, it will never be possible so targetting irresponsible owners and breeders has to be the way forward. Such owners and breeders must face severe consequences if they do not comply. Some dogs are essentially being used as a method of carrying an offensive weapon and how the law deals with this should reflect that.

 

[carlos21]

All dogs should be microchipped. The process of buying or changing details on a microchip should include an identity check so that previously irresponsible owners are prevented from owning dogs. Anyone wishing to breed dogs should have to be licensed. The cost of the microchipping and licensing should be sufficient to cover the cost of enforcing the compulsory aspect of both.

You cannot judge dogs by appearance or breed alone, it will never be possible so targetting irresponsible owners and breeders has to be the way forward. Such owners and breeders must face severe consequences if they do not comply. Some dogs are essentially being used as a method of carrying an offensive weapon and how the law deals with this should reflect that.

nice post kid.

 

[Bluenose1995]

nonsense so because some bellends own big dogs everyone else has to suffer? how about we just enforce the law for a change and throw the book at these scally's who use dogs as status symbols. We already have a dangerous dogs list in this country which is why pit bulls/ tosa's/dogo argentino's are banned, I have a boxer and a Bullmastiff both are naturally protective but they are on a lead at all times and kept away from guests in the house.

Problem with the UK is we ban the objects not the person, instead of banning dogs, guns, knives, cars etc etc. why not just keep these ****ers who dont abide by the law in the nick instead of joke sentences than makes me ashamed to pay my taxes