If you believe that I started this thread as a trap, and that I am a Nostradamus like visionary, well, I am sorry to give you bad news. I started the thread due to genuine concerns about destabilisation in Africa and also the role of certain state actors in this.
This Islamist atrocity in Sudan has just happened so the shock should be a fresh concern for any who position themselves as ethically minded.
It is fair to say that some moral reasoning is much more directed at defending one’s prior, subjective views and bias. I am not suggesting that I am immune but what is clear is that fairness and reciprocity are fundamental building blocks of morality. This should clearly be based upon universal norms of humanitarian culture. So when I say a Sudanese women or child killed is equally as repulsive as a Palestinian or Ukrainian women or child, it is reasonable to expect a truly moral mind to understand this. A biased mind might struggle and if, for example, people are wanting to discuss solutions between two or more parties or issues then any bias would be an issue and barrier. If a person is espousing the virtues of morality, and actively decrying one atrocity, if they are truly moral they will do so equally for all. I think this is fair to say. If not, then maybe it is not a moral issue that they have issue with. Maybe it is not the murder of women and children, for example. That is what I am saying.
You just need to look at the threads covering current active atrocities and you'll see a few active in all, and some that clearly aren't that inclined to care, as is the norm on a message board i.e. by posting about issues with balanced concern. The situation in Ukraine is at least as bad as Gaza with regards to atrocities/war crimes being inflicted upon civilians. The Sudan issue has also just taken a sharp turn back into chaos but for some Palestine is a dog whistle as we can see on here (CA), IMO.Firstly apologies as clearly you haven’t just opened the thread so my points are more from the recent post onwards which activated the thread again
So in short you believe some posters are not empathetic and only care about certain issues because of their biases. Who? Who are the non truly moral minds as you put it who don’t understand one child’s life is as important as another’s regardless of nationality.
“Do so equally for all” there’s a level there where it gets to expecting everybody to have a disclaimer in their posts. I personally assume majority of people posting in here do not have their moral compass that far off whack, even those who I do not like at all.
Maybe a couple like Zat yes I get the impression there’s an empathy and moral deficit there, but it seems to me you are calling out others where I likely wouldn’t agree and wouldnt see this as the way to raise the point with them
Disclaimer: I don’t know and never will know what a Davek is or what they may feel or if they have feelings
Names pleaseYou just need to look at the threads covering current active atrocities and you'll see a few active in all, and some that clearly aren't that inclined to care, as is the norm on a message board i.e. by posting about issues with balanced concern. The situation in Ukraine is at least as bad as Gaza with regards to atrocities/war crimes being inflicted upon civilians. The Sudan issue has also just taken a sharp turn back into chaos but for some Palestine is a dog whistle as we can see on here (CA), IMO.
Davek is a forum hand grenade who gets his kicks through causing upset and anger.
Well you're a ringleader likeNames please![]()
So are you going to call me an anti-Semite or what then?Well you're a ringleader like![]()
theconversation.com
Is that your go to! How strange.So are you going to call me an anti-Semite or what then?

Sadly for African countries they are cursed/blesseed with mineral resources. It was not a surprise to hear that Wagner have a mining partnership with the government. The poor people just trying to get on with there lives whilst these mobsters and political mobsters rob their futures, it is sickening.Lots at stake here, and I'm quite worried for my friends in Madagascar. The current president Rajoelina is a corrupt POS who has used the country's sparse resources to line his pockets. That said, I don't see a civil war happening if the elections go poorly. I hope I'm right...
![]()
Madagascar’s 2023 presidential election is crucial for the island’s future, but it’s off to a rocky start
A peaceful power transition would be a sign of a maturing democracy.theconversation.com
Police have been tear-gassing opposition candidates...
![]()
Madagascar presidential candidate injured after opposition rally teargassed
Former Madagascar president Marc Ravalomanana said he had sustained a leg injury on Saturday when police and soldiers fired teargas to disperse a gathering of his supporters and those of other candidates challenging the incumbent president.www.reuters.com
I mean that's just not true by any measure. If you're going to try to disparage people at least have something to back it up.You just need to look at the threads covering current active atrocities and you'll see a few active in all, and some that clearly aren't that inclined to care, as is the norm on a message board i.e. by posting about issues with balanced concern. The situation in Ukraine is at least as bad as Gaza with regards to atrocities/war crimes being inflicted upon civilians. The Sudan issue has also just taken a sharp turn back into chaos but for some Palestine is a dog whistle as we can see on here (CA), IMO.
Davek is a forum hand grenade who gets his kicks through causing upset and anger.
Was it between 3,500,000 to 7,000,000 Ukrainians killed by Russia 90 years ago - or was it higher?I mean that's just not true by any measure. If you're going to try to disparage people at least have something to back it up.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.