Current Affairs 2020 Democratic Primary

Go on then

  • Abrams

  • Biden

  • Bloomberg

  • Booker

  • Brown

  • Castro

  • de Blasio

  • Gabbard

  • Gillibrand

  • Harris

  • Hickenlooper

  • Holder

  • Kerry

  • Klobuchar

  • Moulton

  • O'Rourke

  • Sanders

  • Vegan Cheese on Toasted Artisanal Sourdough (Gluten Free)

  • Warren

  • Winfrey


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
At some stage you got to look at the two best people put up to run the country and ask yourself is the system working?
 
Like duuurrrr. Like we don’t know the system doesn’t work.

But #VoteBlueNoMatterWho
and get out and campaign for RCV, work hard, get it on the ballot on your state, then when it's on the ballot, make sure people know what it is and aren't scared to to change the system.
But yea, until we overhaul the current system and its incumbent, vote blue no matter who.
 
At some stage you got to look at the two best people put up to run the country and ask yourself is the system working?

If the last four years have done nothing else, it should be to drum into people that "the system" is something they've deluded themselves into believing exists because the reality - that the world is mostly led by people who are the worst of us - is too scary.

I mean look at Paula Cain-White for example, a woman who by any measure you wish to choose is less Christian than nearly everyone else on Earth (including the non-Christian people) and yet she has achieved "success" because she is enough of a psychopath to stand up every day and con people out of vast sums of money.
 
Fully understand and agree but will repeat this again “It is not fair to an individual survivor that their claims require an extraordinary level of confirmation, but it’s what reporters have found is necessary for their stories to hold up to public scrutiny and successfully hold powerful men accountable. So we are here”.

We have at least progressed a bit as since MeToo most accusations now get some checking rather than automatically dismissed.
That swung WAY too far in the other direction imo. If you were accused, you were guilty. Al Franken one case in point. Guy would have been PERFECT to go against Trump but allegations and pressure from a LOT of people made him resign.

At least now theres some semblance of "ok, we need to check this out" instead of one party is right and the other is lying.
 
That swung WAY too far in the other direction imo. If you were accused, you were guilty. Al Franken one case in point. Guy would have been PERFECT to go against Trump but allegations and pressure from a LOT of people made him resign.

At least now theres some semblance of "ok, we need to check this out" instead of one party is right and the other is lying.
Agree that some of it swung too far the other way, I personally don’t think the standard should be “believe anything and everything“ more of a “take accusations seriously and respectfully, investigate and see if can be corroborated in some manner or a pattern of behavior emerges”.

Just don’t think Al Franken is a good example, much as I liked him there were after all 8 accusers with much the same story. There were weaknesses/inconsistency in several of the stories plus some were anonymous which, whilst understandable, brings valid questions about credibility so presented individually they would not have been enough to make me want him to resign. However combined imo they made up a concerning pattern.

I do think however that reasonable people can come to different conclusions based on the same data and how much evidence you require to be tipped from neutral to “suspect there is truth in the charges” is difference for everyone. The key thing I believe is that you try to apply the same standard of evidence to all accusers/accused irrespective of your poltical feelings towards them.
 
Agree that some of it swung too far the other way, I personally don’t think the standard should be “believe anything and everything“ more of a “take accusations seriously and respectfully, investigate and see if can be corroborated in some manner or a pattern of behavior emerges”.

Just don’t think Al Franken is a good example, much as I liked him there were after all 8 accusers with much the same story. There were weaknesses/inconsistency in several of the stories plus some were anonymous which, whilst understandable, brings valid questions about credibility so presented individually they would not have been enough to make me want him to resign. However combined imo they made up a concerning pattern.

I do think however that reasonable people can come to different conclusions based on the same data and how much evidence you require to be tipped from neutral to “suspect there is truth in the charges” is difference for everyone. The key thing I believe is that you try to apply the same standard of evidence to all accusers/accused irrespective of your poltical feelings towards them.
Some of the Al Franken ones were absurd. One was along the lines of "he put his arm around me when I asked to take a selfie!" I mean...yeah, you got to get close to a person in order to take a selfie.

Im not going to say he was railroaded because, frankly(no pun intended), I have no idea. BUT, and this is where I was going back to your first sentence, he himself said "Im calling on the Ethics committee to do an investigation and I stand by their findings". He WANTED people to look in to what he had/had not done and have that be as truth. He never got that chance to as entirely too many people forced him to resign before he could even attempt to clear his name.
 
Maybe these sorts of allegations are ignored so depressingly often due to the status of the accused, that victims know parties looking for an edge are far more likely to listen to you and support you during an election season. And yeah, it's probably political opportunitism by the Republican party, but I doubt that's the motivating purpose of the accuser. She might just see a chance to be heard for once. I think she's very very credible
Same. If I was American, I don’t know if I could vote for Biden. And I think Trump is a poultice of the highest order.
 
Same. If I was American, I don’t know if I could vote for Biden. And I think Trump is a poultice of the highest order.
A Biden presidency is more likely to set up health programs for survivors of sexual and domestic assault.

It is more likely to put in guidelines/procedures where accusations are given a hearing in government/academia/businesses.

Biden is unlikely to use the presidential “bully pulpit” to publicly ridicule and scorn people who come forward as Trump has done on multiple occasions even in situations where Trump himself is not the accused.
 
A Biden presidency is more likely to set up health programs for survivors of sexual and domestic assault.

It is more likely to put in guidelines/procedures where accusations are given a hearing in government/academia/businesses.

Biden is unlikely to use the presidential “bully pulpit” to publicly ridicule and scorn people who come forward as Trump has done on multiple occasions even in situations where Trump himself is not the accused.
I understand that. Just very difficult after reading her account. I probably would vote for Biden but not with any degree of enthusiasm.
 
When you don't vote for a lesser evil you're allowing some greater evil supporter's vote to count twice, since yours isn't there to counter it.

Don't think that if you don't vote it means you're not voting, because in effect you're voting for the person you like less.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top