TBF it’s impossible to consider Reade’s account fairly via the media; the appropriate place for it is in a legal setting.
The fact that it is being dealt with in the media (and now), combined with the other factors (the way the allegation has developed, it not being reported at other times when it might have been expected to like 2007/8) makes it vastly more likely that it is a hit job - and I say that as not a fan of Biden.
That is one difference with the Kavanaugh hearings - whilst not in a true legal setting both accused/accuser testimonies were under oath.
And for me Kavanaugh clearly lied a few times, claiming the ”Renate Alumnius“ reference in the yearbook was to “show affection, and that she was one of us … It was not related to sex.” being a particularly pathetic one. That on top of his lies in previous portions of his confirmation (as ably summarized by Sen Leahy
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...75c740-b77d-11e8-b79f-f6e31e555258_story.html) and Ford’s convincing testimony made me believe that at the very least he should not be on the supreme court.
The changes in Reade’s account, whilst not uncommon in assault allegations, are questionable but I find third party contemporaneous corroboration like her neighbors account very persuasive. We’ll see if any other corroboration occurs, other accusations come forward (sadly these types of attacks are often a pattern of behavior) or if the sexual harassment complaint Reade says she filed with the Senate is discovered.