Current Affairs 2020 Democratic Primary

Go on then

  • Abrams

  • Biden

  • Bloomberg

  • Booker

  • Brown

  • Castro

  • de Blasio

  • Gabbard

  • Gillibrand

  • Harris

  • Hickenlooper

  • Holder

  • Kerry

  • Klobuchar

  • Moulton

  • O'Rourke

  • Sanders

  • Vegan Cheese on Toasted Artisanal Sourdough (Gluten Free)

  • Warren

  • Winfrey


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I have no doubt in my mind this Tara Reid thing would be worth 5 pages in the trump thread if it was bout him. And while I commend Birk blue and LL for addressing it and being balanced as they can be a lot of the usual crowd just ignoring it until a comment in response saying ‘it works both ways for accusations’or a comment saying ‘best to vote for the more competent sex pest’ gets the likes from them. Otherwise they are swerving.

Very eerie.
A good rule of thumb is considering how you would handle it if it was a politician you liked - would it be different?

How would you be handling it if it was an accusation against Sanders?
 
You are correct he didn’t those exact words they were “Look, progressives warned democrats about this” which I do think is a “told you so” and is most definitely is partisan - which is my main message that this shouldn’t be!tT

Making it partisan vastly increases the chances the it is seen as a political hit job and Tara Reed‘s account is not considered fairly which I think it should be.

It’s not an exact I told ye so but it shouldn’t be a thing to mention I’ll agree it is insensitive givin the subject and mentioning progressives is only going to inflame bias on the other side. but as I said he’s giving more empathetic videos on it but anyway.

And yes people are biased of course. One side should be shameful for revelling it as a political win and the other side should be for playing it down or ignoring it.

But there’s something there that needs to be gotten to the bottom off regardless. I know you don’t disagree I’m just saying.
 
I have no doubt in my mind this Tara Reid thing would be worth 5 pages in the trump thread if it was bout him. And while I commend Birk blue and LL for addressing it and being balanced as they can be a lot of the usual crowd just ignoring it until a comment in response saying ‘it works both ways for accusations’or a comment saying ‘best to vote for the more competent sex pest’ gets the likes from them. Otherwise they are swerving.

Very eerie.
For my part, I tend to come out to argue a point I think is invalid.

Biden is a creep. No argument. It's a problem. No argument. In any sane, rational, and just world he would not be a reasonable candidate for President. Man how I wish I lived in that world.

Trump is worse, on all counts, about everything. And in this one thing it really is about the lesser of two evils. Since YOU GET ONE EITHER WAY.
 
You are correct he didn’t those exact words they were “Look, progressives warned democrats about this” which I do think is a “told you so” and is most definitely is partisan - which is my main message that this shouldn’t be!

Making it partisan vastly increases the chances the it is seen as a political hit job and Tara Reed‘s account is not considered fairly which I think it should be.

TBF it’s impossible to consider Reade’s account fairly via the media; the appropriate place for it is in a legal setting.

The fact that it is being dealt with in the media (and now), combined with the other factors (the way the allegation has developed, it not being reported at other times when it might have been expected to like 2007/8) makes it vastly more likely that it is a hit job - and I say that as not a fan of Biden.
 
TBF it’s impossible to consider Reade’s account fairly via the media; the appropriate place for it is in a legal setting.

The fact that it is being dealt with in the media (and now), combined with the other factors (the way the allegation has developed, it not being reported at other times when it might have been expected to like 2007/8) makes it vastly more likely that it is a hit job - and I say that as not a fan of Biden.
That is one difference with the Kavanaugh hearings - whilst not in a true legal setting both accused/accuser testimonies were under oath.

And for me Kavanaugh clearly lied a few times, claiming the ”Renate Alumnius“ reference in the yearbook was to “show affection, and that she was one of us … It was not related to sex.” being a particularly pathetic one. That on top of his lies in previous portions of his confirmation (as ably summarized by Sen Leahy https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...75c740-b77d-11e8-b79f-f6e31e555258_story.html) and Ford’s convincing testimony made me believe that at the very least he should not be on the supreme court.

The changes in Reade’s account, whilst not uncommon in assault allegations, are questionable but I find third party contemporaneous corroboration like her neighbors account very persuasive. We’ll see if any other corroboration occurs, other accusations come forward (sadly these types of attacks are often a pattern of behavior) or if the sexual harassment complaint Reade says she filed with the Senate is discovered.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top