Boss_Blue
I will find you and consensually bum you
I think we may have different interpretations of appeasement Bruce.Appeasement is all well and good
A stable and prosperous middle east, free from extremism would make everyone's lives safer.
I think we may have different interpretations of appeasement Bruce.Appeasement is all well and good
I think we may have different interpretations of appeasement Bruce.
A stable and prosperous middle east, free from extremism would make everyone's lives safer.
I think we may have different interpretations of appeasement Bruce.
A stable and prosperous middle east, free from extremism would make everyone's lives safer.
Of course, that's a utopia, but if you're a citizen that's being killed or tortured by your government, what happens? It's fine to say that military action is bad. It's fine to say that military action may stoke up anger among those who wish to do bad things in the west, I'm just not sure how sitting on our hands helps those who are suffering in the middle east?
For sure, I don't doubt that, but equally standing by and doing nothing whilst Hussein did terrible things to the people of Iraq would not have been great for the people of Iraq either.
Of course, that's a utopia, but if you're a citizen that's being killed or tortured by your government, what happens? It's fine to say that military action is bad. It's fine to say that military action may stoke up anger among those who wish to do bad things in the west, I'm just not sure how sitting on our hands helps those who are suffering in the middle east?
Other than Jezza C, I'm not sure who you're aiming this at.
Bruce we stood by and did nothing as Saddam gassed Kurds and Iranians by the thousands in the late 80s. In fact that's not strictly accurate. First we supplied him the gas and then stood by and did nothing as he used it. Didn't have you down as so naive to think we went into Iraq in 2003 for benevolent reasons.
Because intervention has been proven time and again not to work? Are any of the countries we have intervened in better off now?
There is most likely a middle ground Bruce that could be found with the correct motives.So doing nothing doesn't help people, and neither does intervention? If nothing else, it shows that these things aren't easy, and any politician saying they will (as in 100% guaranteed, no questions asked) will solve this, that and the other should be given a very wide berth. False prophets and all that.
No Bruce, that's a basic human right FFS.Of course, that's a utopia
My issue is with how military action is implemented, the goals and reasoning behind such action and its total lack of effectiveness in stabilizing the middle east.It's fine to say that military action is bad.
It's almost as if every situation is different and requires it's own unique solution.There is most likely a middle ground Bruce that could be found with the correct motives.
Our military actions in the past have clearly not helped the situation. But to in any way suggest we are to blame for these massacres is just plain ridiculous and if anything gives credibility and justification for the terrorists. Those responsible for terrorism are the terrorists themselves the cowardly radicalisers who brainwash those much younger and more vulnerable than them.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.