It's an irrelevant point. The fact is that Dyche was operating under a massively different set of financial circumstances. To deny that is to deny reality.Do you think Dyche was on the phone wheeling and dealing to sell players?
It's an irrelevant point. The fact is that Dyche was operating under a massively different set of financial circumstances. To deny that is to deny reality.Do you think Dyche was on the phone wheeling and dealing to sell players?
This is just a strawman argument. No one's actually said thisHe spent 100m though so we should be top

Here's the thread. C'mon we sold £153 million worth of players while he was manger and spent £79 million that's a negative net spend of £74 million. It's fair to point out the circumstances of the comparison between Moyes and Dyche and btw I'm not arguing that Dyche is a better manager because I don't think he is. The fact that you are denying the simple reality under which Dyche had to operate is frankly bizarre.
How many blues would have jumped at Frank or Howe before Moyes came back?
Class players deeply miss them. Maybe the only good one was Onana, who didn‘t even play a key role at the end under him.No mate, Dyche had to sell Maupey and Holgate so couldn't compete
Class players deeply miss them. Maybe the only good one was Onana, who didn‘t even play a key role at the end under him.
Here's the thread. C'mon we sold £153 million worth of players while he was manger and spent £79 million that's a negative net spend of £74 million. It's fair to point out the circumstances of the comparison between Moyes and Dyche and btw I'm not arguing that Dyche is a better manager because I don't think he is. The fact that you are denying the simple reality under which Dyche had to operate is frankly bizarre.
Which is why no one is making it. However it's bizarre that stating that Moyes and Dyche operated under completely different financial circumstances seems controversial.Coz t therye is no argument
Or maybe Moyes is just, you know, better?It's an irrelevant point. The fact is that Dyche was operating under a massively different set of financial circumstances. To deny that is to deny reality.
Nearly 2pts a game than ?62 points seems more than reasonable to me so where ever that gets you.
Your arguments are getting more and more bizarre. I've already stated that I think Moyes is a better manager than Dyche. But if you can't see that managing the club with a negative net spend of £74 million is a different situation than Moyes's management of the club under TFG then there's not much hope for you.You probably spent about 10 minutes researching a list to pad it out with players like tom canyon and moise keane lol.
Players who were nowhere near Dyche team. I didnt even bring up Moyes. But seeing as you did.
Moyes got the sort of form out of the same players Dyche had that was chalk n cheese. It pisses people off. He's battered him 5-0 on aggregate this season as well.
He's a better manager. Just deal with it.
The two aren't mutually exclusive. Moyes can be a better manager than Dyche and Dyche can have managed the club under a completely different set of financial circumstances to Moyes. Maybe nuance isn't your strong point.Or maybe Moyes is just, you know, better?
Do the mathsNearly 2pts a game than ?
Yup, good ole manager merry go round will do that. Luckily Everton avoided such a decli.. Oh.I didn’t realise how much Tottenham have spent, they have regressed in the league so much as well
Your arguments are getting more and more bizarre. I've already stated that I think Moyes is a better manager than Dyche. But if you can't see that managing the club with a negative net spend of £74 million is a different situation than Moyes's management of the club under TFG then there's not much hope for you.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.