Constituency specific messaging? Sick bastards
When was she a radical leftist???It just means Kamala has no true policies herself. She went from a radical leftist to pro fracking, border control and pro-2A very quickly. Candidates like this should not be trusted.
I get that you are an edgy account on here, whether by nature or design, but while it’s true that authoritarianism exists globally, downplaying the significance of the current situation in Ukraine shows a lack of understanding. This conflict isn’t just another chapter in history, it’s a critical moment that threatens the very foundations of international law and democracy. As has been discussed at length on here, ignoring the consequences of Russian aggression could embolden other authoritarian regimes, putting all democracies at risk. The humanitarian crisis in Ukraine is severe, with millions displaced, and it’s unacceptable to prioritise narrow national interests over basic human rights. Supporting Ukraine is not just about geopolitical strategy, it’s about standing up against tyranny. If we neglect our allies now, we might find ourselves facing even greater threats in the future, making it essential to protect democratic values both at home and abroad.Only 8% of the world live in "full democracies". Around 37% of the world lives under authoritarian rule and as much as 72% of the world lives in autocracies. The world isn't being more authoritarian because of Putin all of a sudden.
Russian aggression isn't anything new. Russia invaded and slaughtered people in Chechnya in the 90s, the worst human atrocity since the Holocaust. Russia also invaded Georgia in 2008. Like literally this is nothing new and of course, there was no outrage previously to this scale.
I hate Russia almost as much as the next guy, I think that country represents the evil in the end times. I also think our allies should be protected. I just don't think Ukraine deserves to be protected ahead of looking after our own citizens.
https://www.project2025.org/Can anyone name one single Trump policy? Like an actual white paper or something substantive brought to the floor?
Executive orders don't count
Well it is, it's just a turning point chapter one way or the otherThis conflict isn’t just another chapter in history,
Would that be the rules based international order, essentially a 'what the US says you do' rules based order, were the rules don't actually apply to those imposing them (see sanctions (cuba most notable in that regard) regime changes (pick any of 20+ that have happened) and invasions (a good few there too) on anyone who doesn't follow the orders.it’s a critical moment that threatens the very foundations of international law and democracy.
All the US foreign policy is about national interest, or rather national interest of a certain element within the US (certainly not the average Joe)and it’s unacceptable to prioritise narrow national interests over basic human rights.
Well it seems China is the country who actually has a very strong policy of investing in the third worlds infrastructure, and it's doing so via a mutually beneficial system, B&R initiative and now via BRICS. Europe and the US have a long history of colonization and stripping countries of their wealth. Modern version of this is loans via the IMF and World bank which then set conditions (imposes them) on countries so that they can be dictated to on what they grow, what they produce and are forced into agreements almost to hand over all key resources to western corporations (called allowing foreign ownership or investment ) but ends up like the uranium mines with the french, selling off Land (Blackrock and JP Morgan say hi).Nations with lower levels of industrialisation and income often face challenges like poverty and inadequate infrastructure. However, many of these countries are making significant strides towards improving economic and social conditions.
This context is important if we are considering global issues, as it highlights the diversity of political and economic systems,
Again a case of the US/western allied world deciding that there system is the only system, and that the system is only when it's one they like (a very narrow view of democracy that)including the prevalence of authoritarian regimes and the ongoing struggles for democracy in various regions.
Supporting genuine democracy is good, supporting a democracy only when they swear allegiance - not exactly democracy in the true sense of the word is it. Can you name the last time a none US ally elected someone opposed to close US ties won a democratic election and the US didn't allege corruption and an invalid result?Understanding these dynamics helps clarify why supporting democratic values and international cooperation is crucial in today's world.
SILLY?!?You'll note I've taken you up about your general assertions rather than any one specific current situation, maybe you're able to debate these points without resorting to name calling or silly GIFs.
SILLY?!?
Bite your tongue, mate!
I'll have you know that silly GIF's are the cornerstone foundation of GOT!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
That is true mate...True they are pretty decent at times, but a fair few use them just to avoid having to actually answer or engage in a debate, so they can just stand there soapboxing.
That is true mate...
Knowing when, where and what GIF to use to drive an emphatic point home requires skill.
It's almost an art form, in its own way.![]()
Infrastructure week.Can anyone name one single Trump policy? Like an actual white paper or something substantive brought to the floor?
Executive orders don't count
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.