Must have had some sort of bonus in contract to keep them up
In a way, I keep seeing comments from Liverpool (and City) fans about being the best team ever, how “United never reached this”, yet when I think back to the 90s, I see
Everton, Spurs, Middlesbrough as your bottom half teams. They’d all have a Go. The lesser teams like Coventry, Wimbledon and Southampton would be far more competitive than your Brighton, Watford and Norwich’.
There wasn’t a big gap because the teams knew how to compete, if you stuck a Coventry or Wimbledon in the League now they’d be a Burnley.
Happy to see Leeds back in the sense that I think it’ll be a more competitive league, but Sheffield Wednesday, West Brom and Nottingham Forest coming in as traditional teams and the likes of Huddersfield, Bournemouth (and their disgraceful 11,500 stadium) staying away is great.
Yeah, it used to be very very difficult to go to the likes of St James’, Elland Road. Villa Park for the top sides and win and these were mid table sides. Now City and Liverpool can go and batter teams away from home who are in third or fourth. It’s a far poorer league and has been for a while with managerial instability in most of the top ten.
Next season will hopefully be more competitive with a better Chelsea, stronger Arsenal, Mourinho settles at Spurs and hopefully a better Everton!
He has/had their best ever win ratio in the Premier League! They had won two on the spin before West Ham!On the flipside they've been very poor since the season resumed and he's made some very odd tactical decisions in recent weeks which, devil's advocate mode on, suggests he may have been putting personal grudges ahead of the teams good.
The result against West Ham was appalling and the blame has been put on his shoulders given the line-up and switches made.
The Pozzo's have always worked on the model that as soon as a manager loses, or is seen to lose, their way or even the dressing room then they're out of the door as there's nothing to be gained. It's often worked for them and if getting shut of Pearson now is seen as giving them the slightest chance of improvement then that's what they'll do.
On the flipside they've been very poor since the season resumed and he's made some very odd tactical decisions in recent weeks which, devil's advocate mode on, suggests he may have been putting personal grudges ahead of the teams good.
The result against West Ham was appalling and the blame has been put on his shoulders given the line-up and switches made.
The Pozzo's have always worked on the model that as soon as a manager loses, or is seen to lose, their way or even the dressing room then they're out of the door as there's nothing to be gained. It's often worked for them and if getting shut of Pearson now is seen as giving them the slightest chance of improvement then that's what they'll do.
Surprised to see the ostrich fired, thought he had gotten them fighting for survival pretty well
Was looking at their managerial stats, Silva only won 7 games whilst in charge.... we hired a manager based on 7 wins wtf!
Is that gonna cost us another ten million quid?
Surely it's Everton's fault.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.