Vincent Tan

EvertonAndAustralia · December 22, 2013

Would not want Vincent Tan as our owner, no matter how much money he has.

Big Fat Sam · December 22, 2013

Khalekan said:
Coulda, woulda, shoulda.

All speculation and what iffery, pal.

But the facts are that Lerner has ceased being the sugar daddy he was and Villa are as financially restrained we are......despite having the "investment" and "takeover" so many on here long for.

Chelsea and Citeh are the only two unqualified successes where these buy outs are concerned.

And even at Citeh, it took two goes to get it right after the dictator from Thailand had them first.

Eh?

Villa had 150 million investment. We had none.

Verdict: Randy Lerner has been a much, much, much more generous owner then Bill Kenwright.

Just because they wasted the money doesn't mean the massive 150m didn't exist!

What we'd be able to do with those riches.

EvertonAndAustralia · December 22, 2013

GarrickJannene said:
Inevitable result if Tan was the owner here.

No it wouldn't, we wouldn't be blue for starters and the tower would be gone as it's "not marketable"

dholliday · December 22, 2013

Chang Elephant said:
Stop cluttering the board up with ****e

dholliday said:
who are you talking to? If anyone's cluttering up the board with crap it's you and your master.

Chang Elephant said:
No need for the language btw.

I hope this was an intentional joke.

bourneblue said:
Kettle calling the pot black here,there's not a thread on this forum that you and your like minded cronies don't hijack,turning it into another tiresome Bill bashing fest.
Intransigence I believe is the correct medical term for it.

is right.

Chang Elephant · December 22, 2013

EvertonAndAustralia said:
No it wouldn't, we wouldn't be blue for starters and the tower would be gone as it's "not marketable"

And there'd be no more spending funds for the manager

Chang Elephant · December 22, 2013

dholliday said:
I hope this was an intentional joke.

No offence mate, but this is a discussion for Blues

dholliday · December 22, 2013

Chang Elephant said:
No offence mate, but this is a discussion for Blues

I know you hide your kopite status by claiming random members aren't real Evertonians. You revealed your red allegiance when you went on about the exact date and nature of Steven Gerrard's contract drama from years ago...no blue would know the minutia of something like that.

And I know why you spend all your time here Bill-bashing. It's because some Liverpool fans are jealous of us having a fan as a chairman. Something you can never have again in your greedy chase after the $.

I'm on your case and have you sussed, but to be fair to the forum, I'll only call you out if you repeat your nonsense claims.

Azzurri · December 22, 2013

Chang Elephant has lost his head.

Toffeelover · December 22, 2013

EvertonAndAustralia said:
No it wouldn't, we wouldn't be blue for starters and the tower would be gone as it's "not marketable"

Spot on, the tower would be replaced by an Elephant's head so it would not be Everton Tigers but Everton ??????? fill in your own words.

Chang Elephant · December 22, 2013

dholliday said:
I know you hide your kopite status by claiming random members aren't real Evertonians. You revealed your red allegiance when you went on about the exact date and nature of Steven Gerrard's contract drama from years ago...no blue would know the minutia of something like that.

And I know why you spend all your time here Bill-bashing. It's because some Liverpool fans are jealous of us having a fan as a chairman. Something you can never have again in your greedy chase after the $.

I'm on your case and have you sussed, but to be fair to the forum, I'll only call you out if you repeat your nonsense claims.

Well done, genuinely funny post mate, but the idea of Liverpool fans being jealous we have Kenwright takes the biscuit. As you well know. (y)

Deleted member 28206 · December 22, 2013

dholliday said:
I know you hide your kopite status by claiming random members aren't real Evertonians. You revealed your red allegiance when you went on about the exact date and nature of Steven Gerrard's contract drama from years ago...no blue would know the minutia of something like that.

And I know why you spend all your time here Bill-bashing. It's because some Liverpool fans are jealous of us having a fan as a chairman. Something you can never have again in your greedy chase after the $.

I'm on your case and have you sussed, but to be fair to the forum, I'll only call you out if you repeat your nonsense claims.

oh lawd!!!

bluejock · December 22, 2013

dholliday said:
It's because some Liverpool fans are jealous of us having a fan as a chairman. Something you can never have again in your greedy chase after the $.

They spend at least £50m a transfer window. Whilst there might be moans about the chairman "not backing the manager" there's not a single Liverpool fan in the world that is jealous of us having Kenwright as Chairman. Not one.

dholliday · December 22, 2013

Chang Elephant said:
Well done, genuinely funny post mate, but the idea of Liverpool fans being jealous we have Kenwright takes the biscuit. As you well know.

Bill Shankly would probably call it identity. It's a concept I think some of you miss since being owned by multisports-owning Americans.

It's frankly a concept we'd miss too if a John Henry came in for us. Yes, we'd love the money and success...but some of us would miss the identity of being owned by one of our own.

dholliday · December 22, 2013

bluejock said:
there's not a single Liverpool fan in the world that is jealous of us having Kenwright as Chairman. Not one.

You're wrong in this. I'd go as far as saying the majority of wooly or plastic Liverpool fans don't care who's the owner, but I'd imagine some of the locals would like the identity of a local owner.

Not all fans care about the chase for the $, be they blue or red. It's football we follow, not the stock market.