The difference in those was that nothing was given by the on field referee. Here the on field referee makes the right call, and var finds a way to change his mind going against regulations.
That’s the big thing .
If he didn’t give it then fair enough , everyone unlucky yet again
But ….
Once it is given they should be nowhere near it
This incident has actually convinced me that it is being used to sway the outcomes of games
The reason being is they manipulate the rules to be able to do it whatever way they want .
They are most likely lawyers …
The way they did it was that the foul was given for a trip by Maguire … so they take that literally … and only investigate Maguire contact and only use the one angle .
The question should have been … is this a penalty ?
They could have said to him … to review the Maguire incident and then while he’s there also tell him to look at the angle of de ligt..
They cleverly use the dialog to get the outcome they want …. That what they said anyway.
However … I was watching TNT and the commentator was saying “they are asking him to look at the pull from de Ligt” he said … “ we have the benefit of hearing the VAR”
However this was not used in the explanation by VAR…
I don’t know why they are swaying games … and they can’t fix them all… but there are plenty of times and moments when they are presented with the opportunity and they take it every time.
If we were 2-0 up that pen is given … not a doubt in my mind .